Teams

KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesChelsea Rhodes / Kathryn Klaus vs Jeannine Mortenson / Lauren Olson7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Diman / Virginia Molan vs Mayela Magur / Vicki Greenway6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarrie Kramer / Katie O'Shea vs Laura Seth / Marjorie Wagner6-0, 6-3
2025-09-24vs KSmith (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKathryn Klaus / Katie O'Shea vs Cassidy Hall / Olivia French6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Kramer / Tricia Magee vs Kelsey Davis / Mary Hunter6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShelby Stahl / Rebecca Fitzsimons vs Alyssa Collado / Allison Bell6-0, 6-1
2025-09-17vs BBaker (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesChelsea Rhodes / Kathryn Klaus vs Lea Williams / Katherine Koppel-Dobbs6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelby Stahl / Jessica Babinski vs Spencer Stoakley / Anna Sison6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Fitzsimons / Virginia Molan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-10vs JGentile (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesChelsea Rhodes / Virginia Molan vs Brandi Hoover / Gabriela ROY6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Yancey / SUSAN ALIOTA vs Courtney Warner / Amy Barrett7-5, 6-4
2025-09-03vs MWolf/Shelley (WSRC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSUSAN ALIOTA / Chelsea Rhodes vs Jen Shelley / Wendy Ranadive2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLaurie Diman / Kylie Holt vs Mary Wolf / Michele Ovendorf5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Fitzsimons / Shelby Stahl vs Lisa Leake / Vickie Koskinas6-1, 6-2
2025-08-27vs LCulp (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Yancey / SUSAN ALIOTA vs Lauren Culp / Sarah Cunningham6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarrie Kramer / Jessica Babinski vs Kristina Johnson / Anne Morgan6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKatie O'Shea / Lindsey Smith vs Hailey Foreman / Debbie Glass6-2, 6-0
2025-08-20vs JCarney (PPRSC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKatie O'Shea / Kathryn Klaus vs Lesly Carlton / Ashley Emison7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Yancey / Laurie Diman vs Corinne McBrier / Mary Eshleman4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTricia Magee / Shelby Stahl vs Nanci Weil / Mary Oakley6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Virginia Molan
published
3.43
Kathryn Klaus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Shelby Stahl
published
3.33
Katie O'Shea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Amy Yancey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Kylie Holt
published
3.06
Laurie Diman
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.01
Chelsea Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.99
Tricia Magee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Rebecca Fitzsimons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Jessica Babinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
SUSAN ALIOTA
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsea Rhodes + Laurie Diman8354% games+0.3% vs expected
Laurie Diman + Tricia Magee242251% games−3.6% vs expected
Chelsea Rhodes + Kathryn Klaus5354% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Klaus + Katie O'Shea4255% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Fitzsimons + Jessica Babinski4155% gamesnot enough data
Chelsea Rhodes + Tricia Magee404 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Magee + Kathryn Klaus314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Yancey + Katie O'Shea123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Virginia Molan
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Kathryn Klaus
76W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Shelby Stahl
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Katie O'Shea
100W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amy Yancey
52W–71L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Kylie Holt
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
3
Laurie Diman
121W–83L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3.5
Chelsea Rhodes
64W–39L career · 7 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Tricia Magee
122W–94L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Rebecca Fitzsimons
57W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Jessica Babinski
62W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
SUSAN ALIOTA
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Carrie Carickhoff
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.