Teams

NNM 3.0W Lobo - Morck

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over League - NNM · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-23vs NNM 3.0W VR - RomeroWon 50
W#1 DoublesShirley Alexander / Odilia Dockery vs Tiffany Liu / Jodi Loftis6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStefani Vallejos vs Mindy Dudar6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSherri Smith / Nikole Lujan vs Clara Ines Rascon Vazquez / Rachel Romero7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNidia Segura vs Miki Matsuo7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Chambliss / Barbara Morck vs Rachel Mosher / Lori Ryan6-2, 6-2
2023-04-20vs NNM 3.0W TCA - SchlossLost 23
L#1 DoublesHeather Seus / Nidia Segura vs Elizabeth Miller / Susie Oldfield4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesStefani Vallejos vs Sue Stone6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShirley Alexander / Barbara Morck vs Katie Gentry-Funk / Kimberly Bell6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMelia Grant vs Monica Foster6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSherri Smith / Sara Young vs Tatum Schloss / Patricia Davis0-6, 2-6
2023-04-16vs NNM 3.0W TCA - ZumwaltLost 13
L#1 DoublesNancy Matthews / Nidia Segura vs Amy Garcia / Melissa Garcia3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStacey Chambliss vs Carol Pierce4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSherri Smith / Nikole Lujan vs Kristen Kohlstruk / Kathryn Traub1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesOdilia Dockery / Karoline Bota vs Carla Anaya / Susan Hagemann6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-13vs NNM/Letz/18 & Over/3.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesShirley Alexander / Stefani Vallejos vs Nicole Letz / Sarah McKamey2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesHeather Seus vs Desiree Meadows7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMelia Grant / Stacey Chambliss vs Jasmine Pitcher / Anakristel Payne0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesOdilia Dockery vs Elise Hadley4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNidia Segura / Sara Young vs Jane Vicente / Michelle Nowfel3-6, 4-6
2023-04-02vs NNM 3.0W Tanoan - SvetWon 32
W#1 DoublesBarbara Morck / Karoline Bota vs Stefanie Poulin / Irene Sokolowski7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStacey Chambliss vs Crystal Wagner-McCombs6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHeather Seus / Sara Young vs Ruthie Trout / Rachel Higgins6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesStefani Vallejos vs Dusti Harvey6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesOdilia Dockery / Melia Grant vs Yvette Paroz / Sara Wofford0-6, 5-7
2023-04-01vs NNM 3.0W HP - DunbarLost 05
L#1 DoublesOdilia Dockery / Barbara Morck vs Cynthia King / CECILIA GORMAN3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNidia Segura vs Sajini Badrinarayan1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKaroline Bota / Heather Seus vs Lizzy Gary / Jane Ryfun7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMelia Grant vs Aislinn Maestas4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNikole Lujan / Sara Young vs Clea Gutterson / Sonja Rodenz7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-19vs NNM 3.0W ELG - EndyWon 32
W#1 DoublesStefani Vallejos / Nancy Matthews vs Susan Webster / Marie Wilkinson7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesBarbara Morck vs Karen Hall3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Chellgren / Heather Seus vs Darlene Endy / Anne Constable6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesStacey Chambliss vs Julie Nemiroff2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSherri Smith / Nikole Lujan vs Priscilla Roberts / Anne Gann Everett7-6, 6-4
2023-03-12vs NNM 3.0W ALTO - CowanLost 04
L#1 DoublesOdilia Dockery / Heather Seus vs Sandra Donner / Marissa Campos1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStacey Chambliss vs Tricia English3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Matthews / Sherri Smith vs Jodi Hummer / Cindy Fuqua6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Chellgren / Sara Young vs Rosalie McGoey / Carrie Cowan2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-03-05vs NNM 3.0W Tanoan - Bailey PereaSplit 22
W#1 DoublesStefani Vallejos / Stacey Chambliss vs Jennifer Brokaw / Tracy Mcfadden6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHeather Seus vs K Joann Clemens7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBarbara Morck / Karoline Bota vs Mary Mihaly / Della Mufti2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNikole Lujan / Melia Grant vs Catherine Porto / Carol Billingham4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Letz/18 & Over/3.0W90351023278
2NNM 3.0W Tanoan - Bailey Perea81301540335
3NNM 3.0W TCA - Schloss72271842364
4NNM 3.0W HP - Dunbar63271846396
5NNM 3.0W ALTO - Cowan45242147379
6NNM 3.0W Tanoan - Svet36192656398
7NNM 3.0W Lobo - Morck36192656439
8NNM 3.0W ELG - Endy27172859428
9NNM 3.0W TCA - Zumwalt27153064445
10NNM 3.0W VR - Romero18123367449

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Stefani Vallejos
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.86
Nidia Segura
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Nikole Lujan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Emily Chellgren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Shirley Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Heather Seus
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.66
Karoline Bota
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Barbara Morck
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Sherri Smith
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Melia Grant
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Nancy Matthews
published
Odilia Dockery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Young
published
Stacey Chambliss
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Chambliss + Barbara Morck4549% games+8.9% vs expected
Barbara Morck + Heather Seus2536% games−3.0% vs expected
Heather Seus + Sherri Smith2344% games−9.6% vs expected
Nancy Matthews + Stacey Chambliss1744% gamesnot enough data
Karoline Bota + Barbara Morck2540% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Matthews + Barbara Morck2537% gamesnot enough data
Karoline Bota + Nancy Matthews5153% gamesnot enough data
Karoline Bota + Stacey Chambliss2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stefani Vallejos
73W–24L career · 14 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Nidia Segura
25W–31L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
Nikole Lujan
14W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Emily Chellgren
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shirley Alexander
39W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Heather Seus
40W–65L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Karoline Bota
35W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
2.66
3
Barbara Morck
62W–141L career · 6 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
Sherri Smith
37W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
44%55%<1%
2.52
Melia Grant
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Matthews
34W–78L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Odilia Dockery
4W–21L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Young
11W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacey Chambliss
60W–83L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.