Teams

CSU GREEN

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-26vs ETA REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTeri Ouar / Bethany Chambers vs Laura Hamblen / Glenna Cook6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelsi Wagner / Jessica Bergen vs Koleen Schriever / Gail Sullivan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-19vs LT BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathy Carlson / Maka Hammock vs Debbie Stechman / Tina Spicer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Sprague / Bethany Chambers vs Mary Rogers / Cathy Simocko-Smith6-3, 6-4
2023-07-12vs HMTC ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesKathy Carlson / Maka Hammock vs Lori Masi / Jennifer Grim3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelsi Wagner vs Anne Spry3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTeri Ouar / Mariana Treat vs Susan Seiler / Kimberley Hattem4-6, 6-7
2023-07-09vs ETA REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesBethany Chambers / Wendy Sprague vs Shelly Donahue / Gail Sullivan6-4, 6-4
2023-06-28vs LT BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Prentice / Maka Hammock vs Janice Sale / Bernita Sterling6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKelsi Wagner vs Tina Spicer6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Sprague / Bethany Chambers vs Cathy Simocko-Smith / Debbie Stechman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Bethany Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.02
Teri Ouar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Kathy Carlson
published
2.92
Maka Hammock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Kelsi Wagner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Holly Rodriguez
published
2.40
Wendy Sprague
published
Jessica Bergen
published
Mariana Treat
published
Stacey Hogan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Ouar + Bethany Chambers5450% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Carlson + Jessica Bergen314 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Carlson + Mariana Treat303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bethany Chambers
67W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
3.5
Teri Ouar
67W–48L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Kathy Carlson
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Maka Hammock
85W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Kelsi Wagner
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
Holly Rodriguez
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
2.65
Wendy Sprague
3W–24L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.40
Jessica Bergen
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mariana Treat
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacey Hogan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.