Teams

UPTA18S/Meredith/ACAC

2025 UPTA Singles 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Singles Men - 3.5

5 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-15vs UPTA18S/Wise/NeelyFarmLost 12
L#1 SinglesGarret Conover vs Mike Wise6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrad Meredith vs Ryan Sgro5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesHugo Juarez vs Tripp Perkins6-1, 6-1
2025-10-20vs UPTA18S/Nguyen/BrookstoneLost 12
W#1 SinglesGarret Conover vs Daniel Dukes6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesBrad Meredith vs Matthew Fox0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesHugo Juarez vs Andre Nguyen0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-18vs UPTA18S/Key/KrocSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrad Meredith vs Josh Dale7-6, 6-2
L#3 SinglesHugo Juarez vs Chris Sousa6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-11vs UPTA18S/Wise/NeelyFarmLost 12
L#1 SinglesZide Lu vs Ryan Sgro2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesHugo Juarez vs Kevin Dix2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesConor Caffrey vs Mike Wise3-6, 1-6
2025-10-04vs UPTA18S/Nguyen/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 SinglesGarret Conover vs Daniel Dukes6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesZide Lu vs RAJ DAVE6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesHugo Juarez vs Colin Gallagher6-0, 6-2
2025-09-27vs UPTA18S/Key/KrocSplit 11
L#1 SinglesZide Lu vs Erik Russell2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesConor Caffrey vs Nathaniel Futral7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Singles Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Garret Conover
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4
3.42
Brad Meredith
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Hugo Juarez
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Conor Caffrey
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Zide Lu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garret Conover + Brad Meredith224 matchesnot enough data
Zide Lu + Hugo Juarez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Garret Conover
26W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
3.5
Brad Meredith
59W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Hugo Juarez
31W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Conor Caffrey
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zide Lu
18W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.