Teams

LCBO-Bolick/facility

2026 Lake USTA 65 & Over League · Women 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCBO-Bolick/facility000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Connie Kleeves
published 4
3.80
Christy Bolick
published 4
3.75
SHARON WELLS
published 4
3.65
Barbara Kosior
published 4
3.56
Alison Siebold
published 4
3.36
Karla Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Jane Prichard
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Bolick + Connie Kleeves6161% games+8.1% vs expected
SHARON WELLS + Barbara Kosior11357% games+4.9% vs expected
Christy Bolick + Karla Williams303 matchesnot enough data
Christy Bolick + SHARON WELLS213 matchesnot enough data
Karla Williams + SHARON WELLS303 matchesnot enough data
Karla Williams + Jane Prichard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Connie Kleeves
46W–50L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Christy Bolick
311W–125L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
SHARON WELLS
119W–49L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Barbara Kosior
145W–132L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Alison Siebold
71W–65L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Karla Williams
377W–168L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
4
Jane Prichard
69W–65L career · no lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.