Teams

TRU:Trull Brook Red Klebe

2025 EMA Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-16vs SFT:Spark Blue:Sideman/VanRavestynLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarizela Klebe / Zhijie Sui vs Lindsay Sideman / Scott Burnham3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWeiwei Li / Angelica Martinez vs Michel VanRavestyn / Kellie VanRavestyn6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJay Pi / Andrea Pickersgill vs James Rubera / Chelsie Foster1-6, 0-6
2025-05-02vs CED:Love Means Nothing:AmesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngelica Martinez / Weiwei Li vs Matthew Ames / Sharon Stearns6-3, 6-5
W#2 DoublesSIDI NIU / Elizabeth Harvey vs Shachenka Downs / Andrew Granese7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPAUL HINOSTROZA / Michele Hertog vs Lisa LaFleur / Jeffrey Cabral7-6, 5-0
2025-04-04vs TRU:603 Positive Energy:ColenaWon 21
W#1 DoublesYoko Sano / Weiwei Li vs Sonya van der Meer / Jayson Burak6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndrea Pickersgill / Jay Pi vs Nancy Vieira / Carl Mcfadgion6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngelica Martinez / Paul Pickersgill vs Samantha Morrill / David Norton7-5, 6-1
2025-03-07vs SFT:Spark Blue:Sideman/VanRavestynSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJay Pi / Andrea Pickersgill vs Toni Cavallini / James Rubera4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesWeiwei Li / Marizela Klebe vs Carla Eberle / Alexander Halkias6-3, 6-3
2025-02-07vs CED:Love Means Nothing:AmesWon 30
W#1 DoublesWeiwei Li / Yoko Sano vs Shirley Ciccolo / Peter Scott6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesThong Pritchard / Jay Pi vs Deborah DonovanPerez / Tony Barna6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Harvey / Tudor Zetea vs Jeffrey Cabral / Lisa LaFleur4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-24vs TRU:603 Positive Energy:ColenaWon 20
W#1 DoublesThong Pritchard / SIDI NIU vs Teresa Colena / Carl Mcfadgion6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngelica Martinez / PAUL HINOSTROZA vs Samantha Morrill / David Norton3-6, 6-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Thong Pritchard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.25
Zhijie Sui
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Elizabeth Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Andrea Pickersgill
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.82
Angelica Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.80
Jay Pi
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Yoko Sano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Marizela Klebe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.71
Michele Hertog
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hieu Hong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
PAUL HINOSTROZA
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Pickersgill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
SIDI NIU
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tudor Zetea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Weiwei Li
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Pickersgill + Andrea Pickersgill142045% games−13.8% vs expected
Thong Pritchard + SIDI NIU4155% gamesnot enough data
Hieu Hong + Elizabeth Harvey2346% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Harvey + Tudor Zetea2339% gamesnot enough data
SIDI NIU + Andrea Pickersgill2346% gamesnot enough data
Thong Pritchard + Hieu Hong224 matchesnot enough data
Jay Pi + Andrea Pickersgill044 matchesnot enough data
Thong Pritchard + Tudor Zetea033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thong Pritchard
61W–64L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Zhijie Sui
20W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Elizabeth Harvey
66W–80L career · 8 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Andrea Pickersgill
79W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
3
Angelica Martinez
12W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Jay Pi
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Yoko Sano
56W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Marizela Klebe
42W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Michele Hertog
18W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Hieu Hong
25W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
PAUL HINOSTROZA
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Pickersgill
25W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
SIDI NIU
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tudor Zetea
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Weiwei Li
40W–6L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.