Teams

San Jose - Cochran

2023 Duval Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

20 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-01-27vs Williams Y - KasperWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteve Cochran / Amy Cochran vs Cort Raithel / Megan Raithel6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Cochran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Jen Frenzel
published
3.44
Natasha Eliz
published
3.44
Chris Oliver
published 3.5
3.42
Dawn Siebenhaar
published 3.5
3.37
Karin Selfors
published
3.31
Nancy Hennessy
published
3.28
Kenneth Brannon
published
3.25
Michelle Kalil
published
3.16
Michael Siebenhaar
published
3.09
Thomas Hack
published
3.07
Steve Cochran
published
2.80
Cynthia Hodges
published 3
2.79
Colin Hodges
published 3
2.74
Cynthia Hack
published 3
Jose Cuetos
published
Katharine Healey
published
Melissa Brannon
published
Roli Selfors
published
Russell Healey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Hack + Cynthia Hack123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Cochran
8W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jen Frenzel
57W–44L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
Natasha Eliz
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
3.5
Chris Oliver
20W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Dawn Siebenhaar
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Karin Selfors
17W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Nancy Hennessy
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.31
Kenneth Brannon
23W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Michelle Kalil
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Michael Siebenhaar
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Thomas Hack
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Steve Cochran
26W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Cynthia Hodges
16W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Colin Hodges
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Cynthia Hack
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Jose Cuetos
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katharine Healey
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Brannon
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roli Selfors
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Russell Healey
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.