Teams

HU - Beckham/Younghouse

2026 USTA League Adult 18 & Over - Fall 2025- HSV · 4.5 MEN 18N2S3D

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-18vs Haliczer 4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLucas Linares / Nevin Langdon vs Joseph Gibson / Schuyler Rich7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBryson Beckham vs Carlos Salas7-5, 6-1
2025-11-03vs Haliczer 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesJordan Younghouse / Kody Ehlers vs Schuyler Rich / Carlos Salas6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJacob Weinacker vs David Haliczer6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBryson Beckham / Nevin Langdon vs Phil Moore / Joseph Gibson7-5, 6-1
2025-10-28vs Haliczer 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesClayton Simons / Nathan Smith vs Wesley Cole / Marcello Squadrito6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJoshua Faught vs Joel Wester1-0
W#2 DoublesBryson Beckham / Kyle Miller vs David Haliczer / Lafe Wallour6-1, 6-0
2025-10-25vs Haliczer 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichael McLaughlin / Nevin Langdon vs Phil Moore / Joseph Gibson6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKarna Palaniappan vs Joel Wester6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJordan Younghouse vs Lafe Wallour6-2, 6-1
2025-10-16vs Haliczer 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesLucas Linares / Kyle Miller vs Schuyler Rich / Lafe Wallour6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Ford / Nevin Langdon vs David Haliczer / Harold Phillips6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBryson Beckham / Christopher Bates vs Wesley Cole / Phil Moore6-4, 6-1
2025-10-12vs Haliczer 4.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesMichael McLaughlin / Clayton Simons vs Nathan Johnsen / Anton Visser6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBryson Beckham vs John Smith6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLucas Linares / Nevin Langdon vs David Haliczer / Georgios Priftis6-1, 6-1
2025-10-10vs Haliczer 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesKyle Miller / Jay Caldwell vs Lafe Wallour / Wesley Cole7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBryson Beckham vs Carlos Salas6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNevin Langdon vs Harold Phillips6-1, 6-1
2025-10-06vs Haliczer 4.5Won 31
W#1 DoublesLucas Linares / Nevin Langdon vs Georgios Priftis / Carlos Salas6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKyle Miller vs Wesley Cole6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKody Ehlers / Jay Caldwell vs Alex Ivey / Anton Visser6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesClayton Simons vs David Haliczer2-6, 1-6
2025-10-05vs Haliczer 4.5Won 40
W#1 DoublesJordan Younghouse / Nevin Langdon vs Nathan Johnsen / Alex Ivey6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKody Ehlers vs Wesley Cole6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael McLaughlin / Kyle Miller vs Josiah Hereford / Lafe Wallour6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLucas Linares vs John Smith6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.5 MEN 18N2S3D
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HU - Beckham/Younghouse90341124262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Christopher Bates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Kody Ehlers
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.36
Kyle Miller
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.24
Jordan Younghouse
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.24
Bryson Beckham
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Clayton Simons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Nevin Langdon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
4.24
Lucas Linares
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
4.19
Karna Palaniappan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.12
Michael McLaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Joshua Faught
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jacob Weinacker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jay Caldwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryson Beckham + Kyle Miller6068% games+10.2% vs expected
Lucas Linares + Nevin Langdon8065% games+7.7% vs expected
Kyle Miller + Clayton Simons224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Bates
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
4.37
Kody Ehlers
22W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
4.36
Kyle Miller
22W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
4.36
Jordan Younghouse
29W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Bryson Beckham
25W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Clayton Simons
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
4.24
Nevin Langdon
48W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
Lucas Linares
25W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
Karna Palaniappan
7W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%9%91%
4.19
Michael McLaughlin
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
Joshua Faught
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.80
Jacob Weinacker
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jay Caldwell
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.