Teams

FK - Lombardo

2023 Marion Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-30vs MARION/Centonze/Mixed18&Over9.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRenzo Velis / Leigh Chak vs Drae Centonze / Lisa Steed6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-24vs MARION/Centonze/Mixed18&Over9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRenzo Velis / Natalie Slatton vs Jonathan Mora / Gabriela Sullivan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebby Watts / Kenneth Apalisok vs Christy Ulbricht / David Hou2-6, 0-6
2023-07-13vs MARION/Centonze/Mixed18&Over9.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTodd Craig / Debby Watts vs Jennifer Hewitson / Jonathan Mora6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-07-09vs MARION/Centonze/Mixed18&Over9.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAdrian Clinton / Leigh Chak vs Lisa Steed / David Hou6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-30vs MARION/Centonze/Mixed18&Over9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesRenzo Velis / Leigh Chak vs Austin Carrola / Lisa Steed6-4, 6-2
2023-06-16vs MARION/Centonze/Mixed18&Over9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSandro Steiner / Jessica Bonano vs Drae Centonze / Jennifer Boyd3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRenzo Velis / Dina Sapienza vs David Porter / Christy Ulbricht2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeigh Chak / Lewis Leonard vs Lisa Steed / Jonathan Mora3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Tanner Watts
published
3.87
Eileen Lombardo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Debby Watts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
CHARLIE ADKISON
published 4
3.45
Dina Sapienza
published
Jessica Bonano
published
Kenneth Apalisok
published
Leigh Chak
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Lewis Leonard
published
Renzo Velis
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Sandro Steiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renzo Velis + Leigh Chak314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tanner Watts
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Debby Watts
186W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
CHARLIE ADKISON
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
Jessica Bonano
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Apalisok
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leigh Chak
140W–143L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lewis Leonard
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renzo Velis
70W–43L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandro Steiner
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Todd Craig
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.