Teams

Lucky In Love 18+ 2.5

2023 Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-10vs CrawleyDon 18+ 2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Sophia Crawley vs Thitima Perrine / Dale Templeton6-2, 6-0
2023-06-01vs CrawleyDon 18+ 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMiyeon Jeon / Andrea Smolen vs Thitima Perrine / Dale Templeton6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBetsy Morris / Roshni Fifadra vs Denise Litzau / Ann Madeleine Nicholso6-1, 6-4
2023-05-25vs CrawleyDon 18+ 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesSophia Crawley / Roshni Fifadra vs Dale Templeton / Marlo Newton7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Smolen vs Chrissy Adair6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Maritza Sepulveda7-5, 6-3
2023-05-01vs CrawleyDon 18+ 2.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesAndrea Smolen vs Grace Tran6-4, 4-1
W#2 DoublesMiyeon Jeon / Seema Iyer vs Dale Templeton / Marlo Newton6-2, 6-4
2023-04-27Won 20
W#1 DoublesStephanie Baker / Roshni Fifadra vs Denise Litzau / Ann Madeleine Nicholso6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrea Smolen vs Marlo Newton6-0, 6-4
2023-04-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Stephanie Baker vs Denise Litzau / Thitima Perrine6-0, 6-2
2023-04-16vs CrawleyDon 18+ 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesSeema Iyer / Miyeon Jeon vs Dale Templeton / Kay Kalber6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAndrea Smolen vs Grace Tran5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.27
Roshni Fifadra
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.95
Miyeon Jeon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Ellen Buckley
published
2.76
Andrea Smolen
usually #2 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
2.55
Seema Iyer
published
2.53
Linda Harrell
published
2.32
Betsy Morris
published 2.5
2.20
Stephanie Baker
published
2.06
Kimberlee Schulden
published
Sophia Crawley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seema Iyer + Stephanie Baker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DONALD CRAWLEY
472W–252L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
3.5
Roshni Fifadra
129W–127L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Miyeon Jeon
142W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Ellen Buckley
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Andrea Smolen
170W–218L career · 13 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
Seema Iyer
3W–16L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Linda Harrell
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Betsy Morris
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
Stephanie Baker
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.20
Kimberlee Schulden
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Sophia Crawley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.