Teams

Murphy/DV/Foothills

2023 Foothills Spring 55 & Over League · Women 4.0 - Sunday afternoon

9 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-16vs Place/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Almond / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Connie Kleeves / Betty Mahoney6-1, 7-6
2023-04-16vs Place/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarol Almond / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Jeanne Ann Lewis / Marian Erikson6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesThanh Nga McIver / Dee Wilson vs Courtney Haan / Lynne Place6-4, 6-3
2023-04-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Almond / Sarah Murphy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-29vs Place/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Sheryl Horine / Carol Almond vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Betty Mahoney6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesThanh Nga McIver / Sarah Murphy vs Lynne Place / Connie Kleeves3-6, 2-6
2023-03-19vs Place/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Beckmann / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Connie Kleeves6-1, 6-4
2023-03-05vs Place/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesLindsey Linker / Mary Sheryl Horine vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Michele Mcbride6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Murphy / Carol Almond vs Marian Erikson / Karen Tonks6-3, 6-4
2023-02-26vs Place/HCP/FoothillsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Sheryl Horine / Lindsey Linker vs Susan Ottofaro Ray / Michele Mcbride6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarol Almond / Sarah Murphy vs Jeanne Ann Lewis / Marian Erikson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Beckmann / Thanh Nga McIver vs Lynne Place / Connie Kleeves2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 - Sunday afternoon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Mary Sheryl Horine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Dee Wilson
published 4
3.84
Carol Almond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Pam Muncy
published
3.58
Kathleen Graham
published
3.55
Karen Ginn
published
3.45
Kimberly Church
published
3.19
Thanh Nga McIver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Lindsey Linker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Almond + Mary Sheryl Horine28961% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Sheryl Horine
71W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Dee Wilson
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Carol Almond
117W–59L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.84
Pam Muncy
31W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Kathleen Graham
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
3.58
Karen Ginn
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kimberly Church
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Thanh Nga McIver
46W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Lindsey Linker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.