Teams

Sanlando-Crane

2026 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 55 & Over-ESL -Day · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-25vs Lake Cane-TuckermanWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Weinard / Jill Civiero vs Tammy Giaimo / Patricia Knight1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Fisher / Sherri Testa vs Paula Hall / Lisa Miller7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Crane / Barbara Bahng vs Kellye Hug / Penny Watzka0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-20vs Lake Cane-TuckermanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRichelle Hayes / Karen Crane vs Jamie Roedig / Shery Cassidy6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSherri Testa / Katherine Foulk vs Kathleen Hansen / Patricia Knight2-6, 4-6
2025-10-18vs Lake Cane-TuckermanWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Weinard / Patricia Bradley vs Tammy Giaimo / Jennifer Widga-Kirby7-5, 6-1
2025-10-11vs Lake Cane-TuckermanLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Crane / Kathy Myers vs Lisa Miller / Denise Tormey6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSherri Testa / Richelle Hayes vs Shery Cassidy / Penny Watzka3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNadine Mosley / Barbara Bahng vs Paula Hall / Tammy Giaimo2-6, 5-7
2025-09-27vs Lake Cane-TuckermanLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Crane / Janice Fisher vs Patricia Knight / Jennifer Widga-Kirby1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDorothy Harris / Barbara Bahng vs Lisa Miller / Claire Fitzgerald5-7, 3-6
2025-09-20vs Lake Cane-TuckermanLost 12
L#1 DoublesSherri Testa / Jill Civiero vs Paula Hall / Tammy Giaimo2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Bradley / Janice Fisher vs Denise Tormey / Jamie Roedig6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNadine Mosley / Dorothy Harris vs Kelly Foote / Kathleen Hansen1-6, 0-6
2025-09-13vs Lake Cane-TuckermanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Civiero / Stephanie Weinard vs Kathleen Hansen / Paula Hall6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRichelle Hayes / Cari Reinhardt vs Lisa Miller / Claire Fitzgerald7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Katherine Foulk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Stephanie Weinard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cari Reinhardt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Patricia Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Jill Civiero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Nadine Mosley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Richelle Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Barbara Bahng
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Janice Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Kathy Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Karen Crane
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.18
Sherri Testa
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Dorothy Harris
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Weinard + Jill Civiero371657% games+2.4% vs expected
Stephanie Weinard + Dorothy Harris5154% gamesnot enough data
Jill Civiero + Barbara Bahng2349% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Weinard + Patricia Bradley404 matchesnot enough data
Dorothy Harris + Katherine Foulk404 matchesnot enough data
Richelle Hayes + Jill Civiero123 matchesnot enough data
Richelle Hayes + Sherri Testa123 matchesnot enough data
Sherri Testa + Katherine Foulk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Katherine Foulk
71W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.07
Stephanie Weinard
103W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Cari Reinhardt
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Bradley
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Jill Civiero
81W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Nadine Mosley
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Richelle Hayes
52W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Barbara Bahng
55W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
Janice Fisher
22W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.54
Kathy Myers
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Karen Crane
24W–34L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Sherri Testa
34W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Dorothy Harris
77W–39L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.