Teams

String Theory

2025 Coed Social League - Spring · 3.0 Coed Social League

6 players · average NTRP 2.70 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-11vs Team ChristieLost 13
W#1 Female DoublesXochitl Foster / Kai Sims vs Christie Wyzykowski / Susan Brunner6-4
L#1 Female SinglesEleanor Morse vs Susan Brunner4-6
L#1 Male DoublesJason Delozier / Matthew Korshin vs Kurt Parkan / Tom Wolforth5-6
L#1 Male SinglesEd Ulman vs Tom Wolforth4-6
2025-04-11vs The SwingersLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesEleanor Morse / Xochitl Foster vs Marlene Dodge / Blair Robinson4-6
L#1 Female SinglesXochitl Foster vs Marlene Dodge4-6
W#1 Male DoublesEd Ulman / Matthew Korshin vs N/A6-0
2025-04-04vs The SwingersLost 02
L#1 Female SinglesEleanor Morse vs Marlene Dodge2-6
L#1 Male DoublesEd Ulman / Jason Delozier vs Ross Dodge / Sean Hickel2-6
2025-03-28vs Team ChristieLost 04
L#1 Female DoublesEleanor Morse / Xochitl Foster vs Susan Brunner / Michelle Dietz2-6
L#1 Female SinglesEleanor Morse vs Michelle Dietz2-6
L#1 Male SinglesMatthew Korshin vs Kurt Parkan0-6
L#1 Mixed DoublesEd Ulman / Xochitl Foster vs Christie Wyzykowski / Tom Wolforth3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Coed Social League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Matthew Korshin
usually #1 Male Doubles 67%, also #1 Male Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.83
Kai Sims
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Eleanor Morse
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Xochitl Foster
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.33
Ed Ulman
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jason Delozier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ed Ulman + Xochitl Foster033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Matthew Korshin
17W–19L career · type M · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.98
3
Kai Sims
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Eleanor Morse
36W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Xochitl Foster
38W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.55
2.5
Ed Ulman
17W–52L career · type M · 4 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.33
Jason Delozier
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.