Teams

CTL40/Ganesh/SEP

SC Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles Men - 3.5

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-23Split 11
L#2 SinglesDeepak Verma vs Scott Sullivan1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesGanesh Radhakrishnan vs Christopher Bradley6-0, 6-0
2026-08-16vs CTL40/Lokodi/WRCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGanesh Radhakrishnan vs Thiagu Chandrasekaran0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDeepak Verma vs Haiyan Du6-1, 6-2
2026-08-09vs CTL40/Lokodi/WRCSplit 11
L#2 SinglesRamkumar Jayagopalan vs Hans Lokodi4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesDeepak Verma vs Christopher Bradley6-1, 6-1
2026-08-02vs CTL40/Lokodi/WRCSplit 11
W#2 SinglesDeepak Verma vs Christopher Bradley6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesGanesh Radhakrishnan vs Hans Lokodi2-6, 1-6
2026-07-26vs CTL40/Lokodi/WRCSplit 11
W#2 SinglesRamkumar Jayagopalan vs Christopher Bradley6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesDeepak Verma vs Thiagu Chandrasekaran4-6, 2-6
2026-07-19vs CTL40/Lokodi/WRCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGanesh Radhakrishnan vs Thiagu Chandrasekaran2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRamkumar Jayagopalan vs Haiyan Du6-2, 6-3
2026-07-12vs CTL40/Lokodi/WRCLost 12
L#1 SinglesRamkumar Jayagopalan vs Thiagu Chandrasekaran4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDeepak Verma vs Hans Lokodi1-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesGanesh Radhakrishnan vs Christopher Bradley6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 40 & Over Singles Men - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL40/Lokodi/WRC4210818148
2CTL40/Ganesh/SEP2481022145

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Deepak Verma
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Ramkumar Jayagopalan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.27
Srihari Nelakuditi
published
3.20
Ganesh Radhakrishnan
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.19
Jeyabalan Murugesan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeyabalan Murugesan + Ramkumar Jayagopalan5260% games+5.8% vs expected
Ganesh Radhakrishnan + Srihari Nelakuditi17756% games+3.5% vs expected
Ramkumar Jayagopalan + Ganesh Radhakrishnan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deepak Verma
37W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Ramkumar Jayagopalan
81W–71L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
Srihari Nelakuditi
79W–63L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Ganesh Radhakrishnan
78W–99L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Jeyabalan Murugesan
79W–73L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.