Teams

PFC-Willman

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-11vs EW-PC-KohanLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndre LaSalle / Jorge Pinos vs Wayne Kohan / Peter Rysavy0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Vancott / Clark Richards vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Walter Josephson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Moe Davari / Craig Hansen6-3, 6-2
2026-04-10vs EW-WRAC-RechtinLost 03
L#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Richard Lester / Stephen Knox0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Vancott / Clark Richards vs Michael Bendtsen / Tom Rechtin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Lamberson / Charles McElligott vs Greg Brizendine / David Jaquish4-6, 2-6
2026-04-10vs YTC-FergusonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Rick Vaughan / Mark Cherry3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndre LaSalle / Jorge Pinos vs David Whiteside / Dan Ferguson3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSteve Lamberson / Charles McElligott vs Terry Kempton / Ken Wagar1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Jorge Pinos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
John Omlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Andre LaSalle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Ray Willman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Charles McElligott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Steve Lamberson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Clark Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Robert Vancott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Moloney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Omlin + Ray Willman423752% games+2.5% vs expected
Steve Lamberson + Charles McElligott111445% games−1.3% vs expected
Robert Vancott + Andre LaSalle51043% games−2.7% vs expected
Robert Vancott + Ray Willman21742% games−4.3% vs expected
Robert Vancott + Michael Moloney2540% gamesnot enough data
Robert Vancott + Clark Richards033 matchesnot enough data
Clark Richards + Ray Willman123 matchesnot enough data
Andre LaSalle + Michael Moloney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jorge Pinos
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
John Omlin
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Andre LaSalle
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ray Willman
37W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Charles McElligott
18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Steve Lamberson
21W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Clark Richards
21W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
Robert Vancott
36W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95
Michael Moloney
10W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.