Teams

KY/LOU/HOSTETLER

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-02vs KY/LOU/LAMPTON/KULLLost 05
L#1 DoublesGrace Bates / Rebecca McClellan vs Patricia Hooker / Missy Jeffers5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSara DeSanctis vs Kaitlin Mooney2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Jokinen / Carrie Ruth vs Brie Roberts / Jessica Broughton0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMary Grace Amato vs Sarah Wilder1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLana McIntyre / Sarah Wartschlager vs Stewart Lussky / Natalie Kjellman3-6, 3-6
2025-02-19vs KY/LOU/BROWNFIELD/OCONNELLLost 14
W#1 DoublesSara DeSanctis / Mary Grace Amato vs Melissa Roth / Diana Schaller6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Hostetler vs Regan Ackerman1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca McClellan / Andie Boyd vs Michelle Harper / Morgan Meyer3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesStacy Highfield vs Maggi Donnell5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Maguire / Kendra Purvis vs Leslie Bailey / Katie Schneider4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Sara DeSanctis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Hannah Hostetler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.92
Grace Bates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Mary Grace Amato
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Rebecca McClellan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Stacy Highfield
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.78
Kristin Weirich
published
Andie Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Susan Maguire
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Carrie Ruth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Kendra Purvis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Lana McIntyre
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kellee Dicks
published
3.49
Sarah Wartschlager
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Kelly Buckner
published
3.48
Jenny Jokinen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Melissa Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Weirich + Rebecca McClellan2544% games+6.4% vs expected
Stacy Highfield + Rebecca McClellan10164% games+5.0% vs expected
Susan Maguire + Kendra Purvis1444% games−8.4% vs expected
Kristin Weirich + Sara DeSanctis224 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Weirich + Jenny Jokinen224 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Mitchell + Sarah Wartschlager123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara DeSanctis
21W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Hannah Hostetler
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
Grace Bates
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Mary Grace Amato
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Rebecca McClellan
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Stacy Highfield
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Kristin Weirich
10W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Andie Boyd
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Maguire
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Carrie Ruth
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.58
Kendra Purvis
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Lana McIntyre
9W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Kellee Dicks
20W–37L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Sarah Wartschlager
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Kelly Buckner
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.48
Jenny Jokinen
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Melissa Mitchell
25W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.