Teams

Travera

2024 FW Tri-Level · Mens 3.5-4.0-4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-06vs AndersWon 20
W#1 DoublesJustin Brammer / Roger Pham vs Scott Anders / James Monroe6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristopher Gloyna / Jeremy Penner vs Jackie Tran / Loc Spann-Ly6-3, 6-2
2024-11-02vs AndersWon 21
W#1 DoublesWade Morgan / Roger Pham vs Tony Le / Cuong To6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristopher Gloyna / Donovan Rivera vs Jamelle Roberts / Jim Sanger6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJesus Munoz / Esteban Kim vs Daniel Zamora / Jackie Tran6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-01vs KanchiLost 03
L#1 DoublesJustin Brammer / Juan Blanco vs Alan Liao / Jarod Sweetland6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJomar Candelaria / Jeremy Penner vs Brett Bormann / Andrew Knust2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWinston Suryana / Dalton Nix vs Samuel Solomon / Lawrence Williams5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Son Tran
published
4.16
Wade Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Roger Pham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Justin Brammer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Christopher Gloyna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Dalton Nix
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Jomar Candelaria
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Jeremy Penner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Donovan Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Esteban Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Jesus Munoz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Juan Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nasrullo Abdulmanon
published
Winston Suryana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Winston Suryana + Esteban Kim9066% games+6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Son Tran
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.20
Wade Morgan
16W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
11%88%<1%
4.16
Roger Pham
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
Justin Brammer
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Christopher Gloyna
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
4.03
4.5
Dalton Nix
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.96
Jomar Candelaria
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.90
Jeremy Penner
27W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Donovan Rivera
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Esteban Kim
15W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jesus Munoz
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
Juan Blanco
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nasrullo Abdulmanon
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Winston Suryana
10W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.