Teams

Khodush

2022 Cap Mixed 18 & over · 6.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs LHENRYWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Hewitt / Keith Spainhour vs Meghan Paris / Bryant Paris6-3, 6-1
2022-07-17vs iGLovejoyWon 20
W#2 DoublesVladic Khodush / Debbie Castiller vs Abigail Weaver / Joel Nance4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelanie Hewitt / Keith Spainhour vs Thomas Rivera / Adna Rubio6-0, 6-0
2022-07-03vs PAlford 18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesVladic Khodush / Melanie Hewitt vs Scott Clark / Kathryn White6-2, 6-2
2022-06-30vs GFyeWon 20
W#1 DoublesVladic Khodush / Debbie Castiller vs Gary Fye / Jennifer Anderson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Benson / Melanie Hewitt vs Luke Gillenwater / Laura Lee Gillenwater6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-19vs JRizzoLost 02
L#2 DoublesDebbie Castiller / Keith Spainhour vs Leigh Stallings / Graham Stallings2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMelanie Hewitt / Vladic Khodush vs Mary Allison Raper / Locke Raper7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-12vs KWilliamsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKeith Spainhour / Aimee Mikula vs Erica Walton / Brent Berry1-6, 4-6
2022-06-05vs LElliott 18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Castiller / Jeffrey Benson vs Theresa Critcher / David Coman1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Debbie Castiller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Melanie Hewitt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Keith Spainhour
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Vladic Khodush
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.47
Lauren Lelewski
published
2.40
Vina Jordano
published
2.32
Nicole Nemmers
published
Jeffrey Benson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Hewitt + Vladic Khodush3357% gamesnot enough data
Keith Spainhour + Melanie Hewitt213 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Castiller + Vladic Khodush213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debbie Castiller
189W–106L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08
3.5
Melanie Hewitt
94W–57L career · 5 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Keith Spainhour
39W–23L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Vladic Khodush
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Lelewski
3W–14L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.47
Vina Jordano
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%78%22%
2.40
Nicole Nemmers
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%91%9%
2.32
Jeffrey Benson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.