Teams

Summer Lovin

2026 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-30vs Serving SunshineLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Aleinikoff / Patty Peterson vs Denise Angelone / CarolBeth DePoy1-6, 3-6
2026-07-22vs Net SettersWon 10
W#1 DoublesKarin Loen / Patty Peterson vs Ying-Chen Liu / Celine Impert6-3, 6-1
2026-06-24vs The Warm-UpLost 01
L#1 DoublesCorinne Crabs / Karin Loen vs Annika Andrews / Melissa Scott1-6, 0-6
2026-06-23vs Smart AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarin Loen / Alison Aleinikoff vs Sarah Bierlink / Gegi Ward3-6, 6-7
2026-06-22vs Chill CrewWon 10
W#1 DoublesCorinne Crabs / Patty Peterson vs Brittney Davis / Alanna Denhart6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Patty Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Alison Aleinikoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Karin Loen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Corinne Crabs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karin Loen + Corinne Crabs2644% games−10.0% vs expected
Alison Aleinikoff + Corinne Crabs2535% games−10.3% vs expected
Alison Aleinikoff + Karin Loen0538% games−12.1% vs expected
Corinne Crabs + Patty Peterson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Patty Peterson
37W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Alison Aleinikoff
54W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Karin Loen
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Corinne Crabs
29W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.