Teams

ROC: Lange/Metcalfe

2024 55&Over Women · 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.79 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-14vs KohnWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlice Lewis-Hickey / Rachel Bigby vs Kathleen Kilmer / Carol Ryan6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTeresa Metcalfe / Cynthia Medley-Evanetski vs Mary Beth Fairchild / Shelley Alfieri6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynn Pierce-Morey / Judy Allen vs Lori Green / Kathleen Krenzer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-07vs KohnWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammy Roman / Deborah McKnight vs Beth McDermott / Carol Ryan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Lange / Neerja Bhatnagar vs Sandra Couture / Lori Green6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPaula Brown / Teresa Metcalfe vs Shelley Alfieri / Brenda Harvey4-6, 3-6
2024-07-31vs KohnWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah McKnight / Alice Lewis-Hickey vs Kathleen Kilmer / Kathleen Krenzer6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesZhimin Huo / Cynthia Medley-Evanetski vs Brenda Harvey / Fauna Pappalardo-Minges6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLynn Pierce-Morey / Patti Mahar vs Sandra Couture / Shelley Alfieri6-2, 6-3
2024-07-24vs KohnWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Bigby / Tammy Roman vs Kathleen Kilmer / Carol Ryan4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZhimin Huo / Keri Stanley vs Sandra Couture / Lori Green6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJudy Allen / Lisa Lange vs Shelley Alfieri / Brenda Harvey3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-07-17vs KohnWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaula Brown / Alice Lewis-Hickey vs Beth McDermott / Carol Ryan7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCynthia Medley-Evanetski / Keri Stanley vs Sandra Couture / Brenda Harvey6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNeerja Bhatnagar / Lisa Lange vs Martha Kohn / Fauna Pappalardo-Minges6-0, 6-2
2024-07-10vs KohnWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Bigby / Lynn Pierce-Morey vs Beth McDermott / Mary Beth Fairchild7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJudy Allen / Cynthia Medley-Evanetski vs Kathleen Kilmer / Kathleen Krenzer6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatti Mahar / Zhimin Huo vs Sandra Couture / Brenda Harvey6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROC: Lange/Metcalfe6014411114
2Kohn0641431202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Tammy Roman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Alice Lewis-Hickey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Cynthia Medley-Evanetski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Zhimin Huo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Deborah McKnight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Rachel Bigby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Keri Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Neerja Bhatnagar
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Teresa Metcalfe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Judy Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Helen Titus
published
Lisa Lange
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lynn Pierce-Morey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patti Mahar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paula Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah McKnight + Alice Lewis-Hickey20761% games+5.0% vs expected
Neerja Bhatnagar + Judy Allen11362% games+4.1% vs expected
Keri Stanley + Deborah McKnight8849% games+1.1% vs expected
Cynthia Medley-Evanetski + Zhimin Huo8353% games−2.2% vs expected
Keri Stanley + Alice Lewis-Hickey5161% gamesnot enough data
Alice Lewis-Hickey + Rachel Bigby3259% gamesnot enough data
Paula Brown + Judy Allen1437% gamesnot enough data
Keri Stanley + Cynthia Medley-Evanetski224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Roman
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Alice Lewis-Hickey
116W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Cynthia Medley-Evanetski
59W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Zhimin Huo
46W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Deborah McKnight
55W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Rachel Bigby
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Keri Stanley
67W–96L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Neerja Bhatnagar
112W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Teresa Metcalfe
53W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Judy Allen
116W–107L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Helen Titus
56W–40L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Lange
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynn Pierce-Morey
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patti Mahar
13W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paula Brown
24W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.