Teams

Whichard - Mixed 40+ 3.5 - Tues.

2024 Piedmont Mixed 40 & Over · 3.5 Mixed Dbls Tues PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesChris Whichard / Karyn Efird vs Brian Maloney / Shannon Hughes7-5, 7-5
2024-07-09vs Kirby - Mixed 40s 3.5 TuesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Gilman / Karyn Efird vs Ginger Hayworth / Daniel Hege2-6, 2-6
2024-06-18vs VANNAVONG - Mixed 40s 3.5 TuesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Gilman / Karyn Efird vs Alina Vannavong / Chris Sigley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-09vs Wykoff - Mixed 40s 3.5 TuesWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Gilman / Karyn Efird vs James Payne / Christa Wykoff6-3, 6-1
2024-05-21vs Herron - Mixed 40+ 3.5 - Tues.Won 10
W#1 DoublesCoray Mitchell / Karyn Efird vs Mark Heinbach / Lisa Baker4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed Dbls Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Karyn Efird
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Kimberly Halsey
published
3.33
Coray Mitchell
published 3.5
3.32
Linda Hestenes
published
3.30
Vangie Cruz
published
Angela Muller
published 3.5
3.20
Chris Werling
published 3.5
3.10
Janice Gilman
published
3.08
John Gilman
published
2.92
Chris Whichard
published 3
2.91
Eric McFarlin
published
Steve Szymanski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric McFarlin + Vangie Cruz134 matchesnot enough data
Karyn Efird + Chris Whichard134 matchesnot enough data
Janice Gilman + John Gilman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karyn Efird
256W–113L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
Kimberly Halsey
57W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Coray Mitchell
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
Linda Hestenes
21W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Vangie Cruz
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Angela Muller
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Chris Werling
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.20
Janice Gilman
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.10
John Gilman
8W–28L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Chris Whichard
25W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Eric McFarlin
32W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
Steve Szymanski
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.