Teams

Fowler

2025 Sequoyah Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over - Christmas Tourn · 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-12-08vs Sequoyah/Amanda NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerina Fowler / Heather Tuttle vs Meghan Wells / Keri Dixon6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Maxwell / Kerrigan LeBoeuf vs Amanda Nelson / Terina Hullender2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMollie Locke / Meredith Banta vs Brooke Greenway / Lynde Pas5-7, 3-6
2024-12-07vs Sequoyah/Amanda NelsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Tuttle / Jewel Akpose vs Brittany Portwood / Ruby Christian1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Smith / Heather Ellington vs Melissa Gamez-Olmeda / Terina Hullender3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCelina Locke / Jennifer Massey vs Abby Hastings / Lynde Pas0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Ladies Tri-Level(2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Heather Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Jewel Akpose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Terina Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Kerrigan LeBoeuf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Sket Angland
published
2.90
Heather Ellington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Debbie Maxwell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Mollie Locke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Meredith Banta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Celina Locke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Jennifer Massey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terina Fowler + Sket Angland3541% games−7.0% vs expected
Jennifer Massey + Celina Locke044 matchesnot enough data
Terina Fowler + Jewel Akpose224 matchesnot enough data
Sket Angland + Jewel Akpose303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Tuttle
35W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Jewel Akpose
53W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.22
Terina Fowler
28W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.96
Kerrigan LeBoeuf
47W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Sket Angland
22W–29L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Heather Ellington
35W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Debbie Maxwell
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Mollie Locke
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Meredith Banta
16W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
2.5
Celina Locke
11W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Jennifer Massey
10W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.