Teams

EHTC:The International’s 55+:DeJuan/Dawkins

2022 NCT Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 55 & Over Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-31vs SIMS:Bowman/GrangerWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Sommers / Greg Plochocki vs Willi Bowman / Randy Miller3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaola Rubino / Steve Wargat vs Lisa Riccio / Simon Ostrov6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Sullivan / JOSE DEJUAN vs Lawrence Klobutcher / Marisol Ostrov6-0, 6-3
2022-07-23vs PRC:Mixin It Up:Mauro/TillowWon 21
L#1 DoublesJOSE DEJUAN / Deborah Sullivan vs Todd Piker / Ivelisse Piker2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEsther Aronson / Chris Drew vs Sandra Mauro / John Scarfo6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Wargat / Janice Testerman vs Susan Anderson / Dieter Fehlinger6-2, 7-6
2022-07-10vs SIMS:Bowman/GrangerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJOSE DEJUAN / Judi Levin vs Simon Ostrov / Meg Castineiras7-6, 6-5
L#2 DoublesPaul Tetreault / Mary Sommers vs Anthony Riccio / Lisa Riccio3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Henderson / Emily Dawkins vs Lawrence Klobutcher / Marisol Ostrov5-7, 5-3, 1-0
2022-06-18vs PRC:Mixin It Up:Mauro/TillowLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristina Raymond / Greg Plochocki vs Todd Piker / Ivelisse Piker3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Dawkins / John Henderson vs Jim Tillow / Martha Tillow1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPaola Rubino / Steve Wargat vs John Scarfo / Jill Scarfo6-3, 6-1
2022-06-15vs PRC:Mixin It Up:Mauro/TillowWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Dawkins / JOSE DEJUAN vs Ivelisse Piker / Todd Piker4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEsther Aronson / Chris Drew vs Martha Tillow / Jim Tillow6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Sommers / John Henderson vs Susan Henne / Kevin Knox6-3, 6-3
2022-06-12vs SIMS:Bowman/GrangerWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristina Raymond / Greg Plochocki vs Lawrence Klobutcher / Janet Traceski6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTracy Tietje / Paul Tetreault vs Steve Arcand / Cassandra Crowal4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanice Testerman / Steve Wargat vs Randy Miller / Carol Troiani6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EHTC:The International’s 55+:DeJuan/Dawkins5112616151
2PRC:Mixin It Up:Mauro/Tillow4211718151
3SIMS:Bowman/Granger0641429191

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Chris Drew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Esther Aronson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Deborah Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Steve Wargat
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
John Henderson
published 3.5
3.14
Paul Tetreault
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Judi Levin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
JOSE DEJUAN
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Mary Sommers
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Janice Testerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Emily Dawkins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Paola Rubino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Greg Plochocki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kristina Raymond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tracy Tietje
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paola Rubino + Chris Drew14660% games+7.6% vs expected
Paola Rubino + JOSE DEJUAN71045% games+4.0% vs expected
Kristina Raymond + Greg Plochocki8852% games+2.4% vs expected
Paola Rubino + Steve Wargat10653% games+0.2% vs expected
Mary Sommers + Paul Tetreault6746% games−11.3% vs expected
Emily Dawkins + JOSE DEJUAN51241% games−11.9% vs expected
Judi Levin + JOSE DEJUAN2837% games−19.5% vs expected
Mary Sommers + Greg Plochocki4650% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Drew
108W–66L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Esther Aronson
161W–142L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Deborah Sullivan
175W–129L career · 2 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Steve Wargat
104W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
John Henderson
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Paul Tetreault
78W–113L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Judi Levin
49W–73L career · 1 line in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
JOSE DEJUAN
96W–135L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
Mary Sommers
45W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
Janice Testerman
94W–63L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Emily Dawkins
20W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Paola Rubino
151W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
Greg Plochocki
80W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristina Raymond
70W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracy Tietje
93W–61L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.