Teams

Shaughnessy: Ball Smashers 18+ ES23

2023 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.0 MEN

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-15vs Duwearatchi/Ballentine 18+ ES23Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas Mihalyi / Cameron Sloan vs Ian Gideon / Jacob Green7-5, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMax Wilkinson / Nicholas Mihalyi vs Aaron Freer / Thor Nelson4-6, 3-6
2022-10-18vs Vyvyan 18+ ES23Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Mihalyi / Joshua Li vs Timothy Hanson / Mitch Bleske6-3, 6-3
2022-10-11vs Gramins: Son of Samson 18+ ES23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMax Shaughnessy / Nicholas Mihalyi vs Steve Gramins / Ryan Kadelbach6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2022-10-04vs Torres/Syverson 18+ ES23Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicholas Mihalyi / Max Shaughnessy vs Jeff Sprinkel / Michael Torres6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Nathan Podolsky
published
4.12
Wyatt Sherwood
published
4.09
Cameron Sloan
published 4.5
4.06
Nicholas Mihalyi
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.01
Max Wilkinson
published
3.91
Bradley Whitsitt
published 4
3.85
Behnam Kholghi
published 4
3.84
Max Shaughnessy
published
3.80
Benjamin Colburn
published 4
3.74
Nathaniel Kline
published
3.69
David Fielder
published 4
3.47
Mark Gness
published
Noah Thacker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathaniel Kline + Max Shaughnessy314 matchesnot enough data
David Fielder + Mark Gness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathan Podolsky
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.29
Wyatt Sherwood
32W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
4.12
4.5
Cameron Sloan
28W–11L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Nicholas Mihalyi
106W–47L career · 8 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
Max Wilkinson
25W–23L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Bradley Whitsitt
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Behnam Kholghi
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.85
Max Shaughnessy
26W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Benjamin Colburn
41W–64L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
Nathaniel Kline
34W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.74
4
David Fielder
13W–19L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Mark Gness
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
Noah Thacker
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.