Teams

Grabill

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over Day · Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-19vs Thompson 8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Ledane / Donald Reuwer vs Al Zanger / Thomas Sperling2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Haines / Vin Grabill vs Daniel Mandl / David Burnell4-6, 2-6
2022-08-18vs Thompson 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVin Grabill / Kevin Hendon vs Mark Southerland / Greg Kahlert3-6, 2-6
2022-08-09vs Tom SchneiderLost 02
L#1 DoublesColin MacLachlan / Vin Grabill vs Gene Rowland / Thomas Schneider2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Ledane / Donald Reuwer vs Steve McCoy / William Bloomquist3-6, 2-6
2022-07-26vs Thompson 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesColin MacLachlan / Donald Reuwer vs Howard Staley / Daniel Mandl5-7, 1-6
2022-07-21vs Tom SchneiderLost 01
L#3 DoublesVin Grabill / Stephen Haines vs David Barnes / William Bloomquist6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesTed Sholar / Vin Grabill vs Lionel Whately / Gene Rowland7-6, 3-4
2022-06-21vs Tom SchneiderSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTed Sholar / Vin Grabill vs William Bloomquist / Lionel Whately3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWall Matthews / Donald Reuwer vs Steve McCoy / Thomas Schneider2-6, 2-6
2022-06-07vs Thompson 8.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesVin Grabill / Ted Sholar vs Cliff Bernstein / Daniel Mandl3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonald Reuwer / James Turnage vs Jay Miller / David Porter3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-26vs Tom SchneiderLost 01
L#2 DoublesVin Grabill / John Klyap vs William Bloomquist / Dennis Weikel2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
John Klyap
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Vin Grabill
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.17
James Turnage
published 3.5
3.13
Donald Reuwer
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Stephen Haines
published
Ted Sholar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Klyap + Vin Grabill4946% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
John Klyap
34W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Vin Grabill
115W–122L career · 13 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
James Turnage
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Donald Reuwer
60W–121L career · 10 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
Stephen Haines
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ted Sholar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.