Teams

Kilauea Blaze

2023 Adult 40 and Over League · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-11vs Kilauea HeatSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGrace Leong / Tracey Lyum vs Karyn Lee / Kathleen Libao-Laygo6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCheryl Hay vs Leigh Bovaird3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-03-04vs Kilauea FireLost 02
L#1 DoublesGrace Leong / Tracey Lyum vs Yoko Engelhardt / Sharyl Shultz2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesConnie Zeng vs Yuka Willis3-6, 0-6
2023-02-25vs Kilauea HeatWon 20
W#1 DoublesCheryl Hay / Darcy Rieches vs Emily Humber / Nancy Vo6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCourtney Lin vs Kathleen Libao-Laygo6-0, 6-2
2023-02-11vs Kilauea FireWon 20
W#1 DoublesGrace Leong / Courtney Lin vs Jhoanna Mabutas / Ryo Shinozaki6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCheryl Hay vs Sharyl Shultz6-3, 6-3
2023-01-14vs Kilauea HeatWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracey Lyum / Darcy Rieches vs Leigh Bovaird / Cheryl Kim6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCheryl Hay vs Emily Humber6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kilauea Blaze4173754
2Kilauea Fire2244863
3Kilauea Heat14371594

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Madeleine Dreith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
2.99
Cheryl Hay
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Courtney Lin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Grace Leong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.30
Tracey Lyum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Connie Zeng
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Darcy Rieches
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Madeleine Dreith
58W–40L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
3
Cheryl Hay
49W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Courtney Lin
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Grace Leong
25W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
2.5
Tracey Lyum
20W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.30
Connie Zeng
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Darcy Rieches
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.