Teams

Horaist/55/3.0/M/POTC

2024 Shrev-Boss Adult 55 & Over - Men · 3.0 Shrev

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-26vs Roberts/55/3.0/M/BTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDouglas Bible / Scott Sutton vs Mark Roberts / WILLIAM ALLRED2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesByron Godwin / Stanley McDonald vs Jay Johnson / Gary McDonald4-6, 1-6
2024-03-14vs Roberts/55/3.0/M/BTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesByron Godwin / David Horaist vs Jay Johnson / Gary McDonald3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDouglas Bible / Scott Sutton vs Mark Briggs / Lance Mosley7-5, 6-2
2024-03-08vs Walsh/55/3.0/M/CTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesScott Sutton / Douglas Bible vs David Sanders / Michael McGill6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDavid Horaist / Stanley McDonald vs Steve Brown / Mark Garcia0-6, 3-6
2024-02-18vs Walsh/55/3.0/M/CTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDouglas Bible / Byron Godwin vs David Sanders / Mark Garcia1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Horaist / Stanley McDonald vs Bob Patterson / Steve Brown1-6, 1-6
2024-02-15vs Roberts/55/3.0/M/BTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesByron Godwin / Stanley McDonald vs Matthew Chaisson / WILLIAM ALLRED1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesScott Sutton / Douglas Bible vs Gary McDonald / Jay Johnson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-01-28vs Walsh/55/3.0/M/CTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesByron Godwin / Douglas Bible vs Alfred Dinkins / Russell Hightower4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesScott Sutton / David Horaist vs Bob Patterson / Mark Bissell1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEron Brainard / Stanley McDonald vs Timothy Walsh / Sanford Katz6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Roberts/55/3.0/M/BTC5114410108
2Walsh/55/3.0/M/CTC4210818140
3Horaist/55/3.0/M/POTC0631530200

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Scott Sutton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Douglas Bible
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Byron Godwin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
David Horaist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Eron Brainard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stanley McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Sutton + Douglas Bible224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Sutton
44W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Douglas Bible
5W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Byron Godwin
8W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
David Horaist
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Eron Brainard
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Stanley McDonald
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.