Teams

Cheval Smokin' Aces/ L. Gatza

2026 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-30vs HILLS/SchneiderLost 23
L#1 DoublesKalicharan Durgampudi / Nicholas Kitchen vs Johnny Fung / Jason Lee4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichel Berger vs Felipe Guacache6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSomil Kadakia / Sean O'Brien vs Jacob Munch / James Schneider7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKen Patrick / James Feeney vs Max Collazo / Ken Chin5-7, 1-6
L#4 DoublesEdward Lindblom / John Jackson vs Steven Friedman / Michael Palmer3-6, 4-6
2026-05-16vs Hunters Green / M. WarrenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKenneth Sallings / Somil Kadakia vs Christopher Baker / Ian Zhang6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRanjit Singh / Kalicharan Durgampudi vs Timothy Carr / John Phillips6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJohn Jackson / Stephen Jones vs William Livingston / Philip Kalafut0-1
L#4 DoublesKen Patrick / James Feeney vs Ken Kranick / David Mardo4-6, 6-7
2026-05-08Won 20
W#1 SinglesJoel Sparr vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLuke Gatza / James Feeney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-25vs Sun City Center/ K. JohnsonWon 31
W#1 DoublesLuke Gatza / Kenneth Sallings vs KEVIN JOHNSON / Qin Yang6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKalicharan Durgampudi / Ken Patrick vs Bob Astone / Neal Peterson6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJames Feeney / Ron Bansky vs Joe Izzo / Randy McPhee3-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesJohn Jackson / Edward Lindblom vs Henry Gales / Wayne Keyes6-1, 6-4
2026-04-18vs Temple Terrace / JenkinsLost 23
L#1 DoublesPeter Martino / John Jackson vs Brian Westmoreland / Ken Coulter4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMichel Berger vs Mike Churton6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKen Patrick / Edward Lindblom vs Max R Francois / Walter Norwood2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKenneth Sallings / Nicholas Kitchen vs Patrick Rairigh / Daniel Shields6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesStephen Jones / Sean O'Brien vs Peter Trakas / Steven Jenkins6-2, 6-3
2026-04-11vs Buckhorn/O. CantuLost 14
L#1 DoublesSomil Kadakia / Kenneth Sallings vs SHANKAR SELVARAJAN / Kiran Dwarakanath Mane4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichel Berger vs John Field7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSean O'Brien / Matthew David vs Edward Colihan / Jeremy Stuart4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLuke Gatza / Stephen Jones vs Omar Cantu / David Jordy0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#4 DoublesRon Bansky / Ken Patrick vs CARLOS Ramirez / Timothy Mualchin0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Ranjit Singh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Michel Berger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Matthew David
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Kalicharan Durgampudi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Peter Martino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Kenneth Sallings
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.28
Nicholas Kitchen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Luke Gatza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Edward Lindblom
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Ken Patrick
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.17
Somil Kadakia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Joel Sparr
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Ron Bansky
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
James Feeney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Stephen Jones
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Sallings + Somil Kadakia5554% games+4.5% vs expected
Nicholas Kitchen + Kenneth Sallings314 matchesnot enough data
Kalicharan Durgampudi + Ken Patrick224 matchesnot enough data
Joel Sparr + Luke Gatza213 matchesnot enough data
James Feeney + Ken Patrick033 matchesnot enough data
Kalicharan Durgampudi + Ranjit Singh213 matchesnot enough data
Ken Patrick + Ron Bansky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ranjit Singh
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
Michel Berger
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Matthew David
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Kalicharan Durgampudi
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
Peter Martino
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Kenneth Sallings
24W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Nicholas Kitchen
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
Luke Gatza
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Edward Lindblom
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
Ken Patrick
10W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Somil Kadakia
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Joel Sparr
50W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Ron Bansky
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
James Feeney
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
Stephen Jones
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.