Teams

Mirror Lake - Dean//Jones

2025 Combo 18 & Over Women Day - Mobile · 2.5 Women Day 18

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-10vs CCM - MathewsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMegan Esslinger / Sohee Kim vs Caroline Mathews / Monica Nash6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaly Pollman / Nita Davis vs Mary Candace Vegliacich / Anne Sand6-3, 6-4
2025-07-28vs Lake Forest - YoungWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Scott / Ali Jones vs Heather Horton / Amy Kennedy6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarrie Dean / Sohee Kim vs Kelley Morris / Lauren Latham3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNita Davis / Hannah Perez vs Tara Hall / Lindsay Young3-6, 5-7
2025-07-02vs CCM - MathewsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSohee Kim / Ali Jones vs Kim Laan / Fallon Gleason3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarrie Dean / Megan Esslinger vs Caroline Mathews / Monica Nash0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNita Davis / Ashley Robertson vs Jamie Flotte / Amy Cooksey0-6, 2-6
2025-06-25vs Lake Forest - YoungWon 21
W#1 DoublesSohee Kim / Jennifer Scott vs Tara Hall / Lindsay Young6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNita Davis / Carrie Dean vs Kelley Morris / Amy Kennedy2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Robertson / Monica Cook vs Sheri Silverwolf / Jennifer Byerly6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Day 18 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Jennifer Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Sohee Kim
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.35
Nita Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Jeannie Nix
published
2.20
Megan Esslinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.02
Hannah Perez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Daly Pollman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.94
Carrie Dean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.92
Ashley Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sohee Kim + Megan Esslinger2547% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Dean + Nita Davis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Scott
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Sohee Kim
9W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Nita Davis
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
Jeannie Nix
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Megan Esslinger
14W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
Hannah Perez
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Daly Pollman
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Carrie Dean
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
2.5
Ashley Robertson
2W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.