Teams

JThaker/GHolmes (BCC)

2022 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-05vs KNovak (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Kathleen Dorff vs Whitney Sasser / Margaret Hiller6-2, 6-0
2022-10-03vs JNomina/JSanderson (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDori Cazorla / Kathleen Dorff vs Caroline Crownover / Karol Beverley6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Gaye Holmes vs Tina Hough / Anita Matai1-6, 4-6
2022-09-26vs TSetzer (Weddington)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Gaye Holmes vs Terri Setzer / Beverly Russo2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-12vs EKyle (FCC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Christine Hotham vs Lisa Guacci / Johanne Bulger2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelodie Ohaus / Dana Libner vs Kathy Sawrey / Brenda Cage2-6, 4-6
2022-08-31vs KNovak (Charlotte Indoor)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDori Cazorla / Kathleen Dorff vs Lynne Herrin / Helen-Marie Berthold6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Gaye Holmes vs Vicki Greenway / Margaret Hiller6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCheryl Jensen / Melodie Ohaus vs Becky Hensley / Debbie Ferguson6-2, 6-2
2022-08-29vs JNomina/JSanderson (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Gaye Holmes vs Eva Gold / Ellen Carlisle4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesJigisha Thaker / Barbara Reichard vs Wendy Hall / Pam Olsen6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Carlene Delorenzo
published 3.5
3.13
Jigisha Thaker
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.03
Dori Cazorla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Christine Hotham
published 3
2.90
Melodie Ohaus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Gaye Holmes
published 3
2.84
Dina DiMartino
published 3.5
Barbara Reichard
published 3
2.61
Jean Sharpe
published
Dana Libner
published
Karen Maskas
published
Kathleen Dorff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Reichard + Carlene Delorenzo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carlene Delorenzo
16W–26L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Jigisha Thaker
64W–65L career · 7 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dori Cazorla
79W–92L career · 2 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Christine Hotham
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Melodie Ohaus
98W–142L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Gaye Holmes
8W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3.5
Dina DiMartino
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
2.84
3
Barbara Reichard
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jean Sharpe
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
2.61
Dana Libner
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Maskas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Dorff
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.