Teams

MCAC:Travis:Braude

2026 Cape Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed FLT 1

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-06vs MCAC:Waldron:CampbellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPavel Braude / Elisa Zawadzkas vs Alexander Howard / Chealsey Giatrelis7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMoira Hedberg / Gennady Burakovsky vs David Kroll / Irina Lidforss6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-01vs MCAC:Waldron:CampbellLost 12
W#1 DoublesKyra Travis / Brandon Cutter vs Camden Mazzoni / Chealsey Giatrelis7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMoira Hedberg / Gennady Burakovsky vs Benjamin Simmons / Irina Lidforss5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesXavier ELBAZ / Elisa Zawadzkas vs Elizabeth Campbell / Jeff Tocco4-6, 5-7
2026-04-10vs MCAC:Waldron:CampbellWon 10
W#2 DoublesGabriella Dadoly / Xavier ELBAZ vs Alexandre Uttard / Nicole Waldron2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-03vs MCAC:Waldron:CampbellSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Dadoly / Xavier ELBAZ vs David Kroll / Irina Lidforss6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMoira Hedberg / Devon Puglia vs Elizabeth Campbell / Jeff Tocco3-6, 2-6
2026-03-20vs MCAC:Waldron:CampbellWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandon Cutter / Kyra Travis vs Elizabeth Campbell / Eric Rogers6-3, 6-2
2026-03-13vs MCAC:Waldron:CampbellWon 10
W#1 DoublesElisa Zawadzkas / Xavier ELBAZ vs Elizabeth Campbell / Gerard Melillo6-3, 6-4
2026-03-06vs MCAC:Waldron:CampbellWon 10
W#2 DoublesElisa Zawadzkas / Xavier ELBAZ vs Lauriene Morin / David Kroll6-2, 6-4
2026-02-27vs MCAC:Waldron:CampbellLost 01
L#2 DoublesMoira Hedberg / Xavier ELBAZ vs Lauriene Morin / David Kroll1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Mixed FLT 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:Waldron:Campbell62141023225
2MCAC:Travis:Braude26101429238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brandon Cutter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.34
Elisa Zawadzkas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.29
Xavier ELBAZ
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Devon Puglia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Gabriella Dadoly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.19
Alexandra Dadoly
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Gennady Burakovsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Kyra Travis
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.67
Gregory Cole
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
Moira Hedberg
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Pavel Braude
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pavel Braude + Kyra Travis6849% gamesnot enough data
Devon Puglia + Kyra Travis7160% gamesnot enough data
Gregory Cole + Kyra Travis5260% gamesnot enough data
Elisa Zawadzkas + Gregory Cole2351% gamesnot enough data
Gregory Cole + Alexandra Dadoly134 matchesnot enough data
Devon Puglia + Moira Hedberg044 matchesnot enough data
Elisa Zawadzkas + Xavier ELBAZ213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brandon Cutter
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Elisa Zawadzkas
44W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
Xavier ELBAZ
32W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Devon Puglia
10W–7L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Gabriella Dadoly
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Alexandra Dadoly
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Gennady Burakovsky
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
Kyra Travis
84W–30L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
Gregory Cole
38W–30L career · type M · 8 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Moira Hedberg
4W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pavel Braude
36W–17L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.