Teams

Ross-Brockett

2022 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Yukiko Namba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2022-08-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / Lisa Heinsen vs Tina Nelson / Christy Wilson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Heinsen / Yukiko Namba vs Perla Lewis / Tricia Wimmer6-4, 6-4
2022-08-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Heinsen / Yukiko Namba vs Alena Lauritsen / Dayna Jahnke-Corwin6-1, 6-3
2022-08-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Heinsen / Yukiko Namba vs Gail Bolte / Sheila Schmidt6-1, 6-2
2022-07-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Ross-Brockett / Neoma Sugarman vs Barbara Gram / Rachael Seeger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesNeoma Sugarman / Cynthia Ross-Brockett vs Autumn Bunch / Shannon Darrow6-2, 6-4
2022-06-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Heinsen / Yukiko Namba vs Susanne Cochran / Jodi Wilkins6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Cynthia Ross-Brockett
119W–97L career
0%96%4%
2.89
3
Yukiko Namba
27W–29L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.