Teams

Cherokee/Barbara Wilkins

Cherokee Spring - USTA Mixed 40 & Over · 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-02vs Great Sky - SollenbergerWon 10
W#1 DoublesTed Zeskoski / Jennifer Luker vs Jay Aleck / Cindy Klein6-0, 6-0
2025-04-25vs Great Sky - SollenbergerWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Smith / Tony Syracuse vs Jay Aleck / Cindy Klein6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTed Zeskoski / Dorothy Shipskie vs Julie Young / Brian Mcewan6-2, 6-0
2025-04-18vs Great Sky - SollenbergerWon 21
W#1 DoublesSam Wilburn / Dorothy Shipskie vs Julie Young / Pitu Rasheed6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTed Zeskoski / Melissa Adams vs Brad Hoecker / Susan Hoecker6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBarbara Wilkins / Robert Abbott vs Donald Marshall / Tina Ringkamp4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-04-11vs Great Sky - SollenbergerWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrian Hughes / Dorothy Shipskie vs Karen Fullerton / Brian Mcewan6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Abbott / Jennifer Luker vs Jay Aleck / Laura Sollenberger6-3, 6-2
2025-03-28vs Great Sky - SollenbergerWon 30
W#1 DoublesTed Zeskoski / Jennifer Luker vs Karen Fullerton / Arpit Bhoti6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBarbara Wilkins / Brian Hughes vs Cindy Klein / Pitu Rasheed6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTony Syracuse / Danielle Smith vs Brian Mcewan / Lauri Enyart6-0, 6-0
2025-03-21vs Great Sky - SollenbergerWon 20
W#1 DoublesTed Zeskoski / Jennifer Luker vs Donald Marshall / Tina Ringkamp6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDanielle Smith / Tony Syracuse vs Julie Young / Rocky Payne6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Jennifer Luker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.49
Tony Syracuse
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Barbara Wilkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Brian Hughes
published 3.5
Dorothy Shipskie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Adams
published
Ted Zeskoski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ted Zeskoski + Jennifer Luker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Luker
22W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
Tony Syracuse
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Barbara Wilkins
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Brian Hughes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Dorothy Shipskie
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Adams
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ted Zeskoski
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.