Teams

KY/LOU/HOFFMAN

2022 USTA MIXED 18 & Over · 8.0 ADULT MIXED

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.0 ADULT MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Bjerke
published 4.5
4.01
Brian Zipse
published 4.5
3.81
Jennifer G Wood
published
3.79
Troy Fontana
published
3.75
Gloria Hoffmann
published 4
3.71
Clay Cauley
published 4
3.70
Chris Cotton
published 4
3.68
Thomas Knepshield
published
3.66
Lauren Kirby
published
3.61
Suzanne Bush
published
3.52
Jeff Spencer
published
3.51
Phil Wafford
published
3.47
Robert Bouhl
published
3.39
Christie Wafford
published 3.5
3.27
Robin Snook
published
Aaron Crellin
published 3.5
Abby Hart
published
Leslie Strahl
published
Mark Landry
published
Robbie Summers
published
Whitney McNicol
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Kirby + Chris Cotton2338% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Spencer + Suzanne Bush224 matchesnot enough data
Clay Cauley + Jennifer G Wood224 matchesnot enough data
Clay Cauley + Lauren Kirby303 matchesnot enough data
Christie Wafford + Phil Wafford123 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Bush + Benjamin Bjerke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Benjamin Bjerke
20W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Brian Zipse
24W–31L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.01
Jennifer G Wood
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Troy Fontana
30W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Gloria Hoffmann
25W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Clay Cauley
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Chris Cotton
12W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Thomas Knepshield
39W–28L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Lauren Kirby
22W–19L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Suzanne Bush
21W–17L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
Jeff Spencer
10W–29L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Phil Wafford
20W–33L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
Robert Bouhl
14W–23L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Christie Wafford
24W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
Robin Snook
14W–25L career · no lines in 2022
96%4%<1%
3.27
3.5
Aaron Crellin
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Abby Hart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Strahl
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Landry
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robbie Summers
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Whitney McNicol
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.