Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Rawlings

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 9.0W

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs Liberty Park Tennis-WoodburyWon 20
W#2 DoublesJanine Petersen / Julie DeLong vs Sue Smith / Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLynette Duran / Jennifer Hathaway vs Jane McQuade / Susan Ellison6-1, 6-2
2024-05-22vs Liberty Park Tennis-WoodburyLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Rawlings / Lynette Duran vs Patrice Duvernay / Pamela Hofmann3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanine Petersen / Julie DeLong vs Jane McQuade / Ann Phillips6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Marz / Jennifer Hathaway vs Christie Brightwell / Laura Bailey7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2024-05-15vs Liberty Park Tennis-WoodburyLost 02
L#2 DoublesLouise O'Reilly / Lee Chase vs Patrice Duvernay / Tracey Valentine0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Rawlings / Julie DeLong vs Jane McQuade / Ann Phillips4-6, 0-6
2024-05-08vs Liberty Park Tennis-WoodburyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanine Petersen / Julie DeLong vs Christie Brightwell / Laura Bailey7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra Rawlings / Lynette Duran vs Patrice Duvernay / Tracey Valentine1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDiana Granger / Jill Russell vs Jane McQuade / Ann Phillips2-6, 1-6
2024-05-01vs Liberty Park Tennis-WoodburySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Granger / Stacey Maxfield vs Patrice Duvernay / Tracey Valentine4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanine Petersen / Julie DeLong vs Jane McQuade / Pamela Hofmann6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-24vs Liberty Park Tennis-WoodburyWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanine Petersen / Louise O'Reilly vs Patrice Duvernay / Janine Nesseth6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLynette Duran / Jennifer Hathaway vs Susan Ellison / Pamela Hofmann6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDebra Rawlings / Sue Curtis vs Jane McQuade / Ann Phillips1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-07-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hathaway / Lynette Duran vs Marie Roberts / Louise O'Reilly6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park Tennis-Rawlings339922171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Janine Petersen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.25
Diana Granger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Lynette Duran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Debra Rawlings
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.05
Sue Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.95
Jennifer Hathaway
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.91
Linda Marz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.91
Tracy Derby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Lee Chase
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Jill Russell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie DeLong
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Louise O'Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Stacey Maxfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janine Petersen + Diana Granger19263% games+7.9% vs expected
Lynette Duran + Jennifer Hathaway12955% games+3.1% vs expected
Janine Petersen + Julie DeLong12362% games+0.7% vs expected
Debra Rawlings + Diana Granger14558% games+0.5% vs expected
Debra Rawlings + Linda Marz8256% games+0.1% vs expected
Linda Marz + Lynette Duran292055% games−2.0% vs expected
Linda Marz + Jennifer Hathaway181650% games−4.3% vs expected
Debra Rawlings + Lynette Duran4546% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Janine Petersen
77W–34L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
4.48
4.5
Diana Granger
64W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.25
4.5
Lynette Duran
186W–144L career · 12 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Debra Rawlings
161W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
4.12
Sue Curtis
49W–49L career · 10 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
Jennifer Hathaway
65W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.95
4.5
Linda Marz
140W–118L career · 8 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.91
Tracy Derby
65W–54L career · 8 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.91
Lee Chase
48W–33L career · 1 line in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Jill Russell
54W–56L career · 6 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
Julie DeLong
70W–36L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Louise O'Reilly
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacey Maxfield
12W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.