Teams

Plant City - P. Smith

2022 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-13vs Hunters Green - E. VickersLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatricia Smith / Anne Jensen-McAvoy vs Elizabeth Dasilva / Hannah Gabora4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSheila Brown / Julianna Holbrook vs Tricia Cardoso / Annmarie Iwanicki4-6, 4-6
2022-10-30vs Hills/G. BurkeLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarla Borja / Carol Guido vs Caralyn Paul / Jody McNamee4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Mudge / Patricia Smith vs Elaine Jones / Denys Hubbard6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-10-23vs Hunters Green - E. VickersLost 01
L#3 DoublesCynthia Scaletta / Julianna Holbrook vs Erin Vickers / Theresa Mays1-6, 3-6
2022-10-09vs Hills/G. BurkeLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnne Jensen-McAvoy / Cynthia Scaletta vs Beth Hart / Jody McNamee0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKarla Borja / Carol Guido vs Kristine Genovese / Karen Wilhelm-Mace6-7, 3-6
2022-09-18vs Hills/G. BurkeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKarla Borja / Carol Guido vs Silvia Srour / Karen Wilhelm-Mace7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulianna Holbrook / Cynthia Scaletta vs Geri Burke / Celeste Kallenborn0-6, 0-6
2022-09-11vs Hunters Green - E. VickersLost 01
L#1 DoublesNorma Solters / Carol Guido vs Annmarie Iwanicki / Hannah Gabora6-0, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Karla Borja
published
3.17
Carol Guido
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Dang Williamson
published 3.5
2.91
Anne Jensen-McAvoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Angie Mudge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Patricia Smith
published
2.55
Sheila Brown
published
2.37
Julianna Holbrook
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.99
Cynthia Scaletta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julianna Holbrook + Cynthia Scaletta52134% games−10.4% vs expected
Angie Mudge + Carol Guido044 matchesnot enough data
Angie Mudge + Anne Jensen-McAvoy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karla Borja
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Carol Guido
232W–216L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Dang Williamson
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Anne Jensen-McAvoy
59W–92L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Angie Mudge
49W–104L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
Patricia Smith
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Sheila Brown
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55
Julianna Holbrook
60W–151L career · 3 lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.37
2.5
Cynthia Scaletta
46W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.