Teams

MC SILVER

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.56 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-19vs LPTC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaty Plath / Brad Nash vs ELIZABETH SKLAROFF / Kyle Nelson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-12vs MC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaty Plath / Brad Nash vs Pamela Catalano / Carper Davis6-3, 7-6
2024-05-05vs NJ BLUESplit 11
W#2 DoublesKaty Plath / Brad Nash vs Garrett Sailer / Denise Champion6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Sprague / Ellen Sprague vs Thomas DelaFuente / Carrie Poulsen1-6, 2-6
2024-04-21vs BP SILVERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrad Nash / Katy Plath vs Everett Johnson / Maurice Murray6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Hartney / Sue Hickey vs Susan Gallo / Harvey Wherry6-0, 6-1
2024-04-14vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesEllen Sprague / Austin Scott vs Kathleen Rimlinger / Charles Snethen5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Hartney / Sue Hickey vs Ely Garza / Adrienne Oliver7-5, 7-5
2024-04-07vs RHCC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesKaty Plath / Brad Nash vs Amelia Hendrickson / Michael Warren6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Joe Rosen
published
3.76
Sue Hickey
published
3.75
Ana Hunsinger
published 4
3.48
Ann Rhoads
published 3.5
3.47
Katy Plath
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Charles Sprague
published 3.5
3.41
Ellen Sprague
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
John Hartney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Austin Scott
published 3.5
3.23
Brad Nash
published 3.5
2.98
Erik Hunsinger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Sprague + Ellen Sprague2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joe Rosen
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Sue Hickey
26W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Ana Hunsinger
39W–25L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Ann Rhoads
46W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Katy Plath
50W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.47
3.5
Charles Sprague
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Ellen Sprague
100W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
John Hartney
94W–26L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Austin Scott
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brad Nash
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Erik Hunsinger
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.