Teams

STC WELAYA

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 2.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-07vs BIR CONRAD/LINGTONLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobin Groninga / Laksmi Davaloor vs Kayli Conrad / Brandy Oetman2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKimberley Jagielko vs Shannon Morgan4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLindsey Dusek / Jennifer Rogerson vs Erica Mulcahy / Shaun Lington6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-28vs TCU MEYER/THOMASWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kelly / Kim Tanner vs Shannon Carufe / Allison Khan6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAmber Hupp vs Kelsey Wilkins6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRama Welaya / Rhya Miller vs Keri Grady / Vanessa Whetsell6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-24vs SO JENNINGS/VOIGTWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmber Hupp / Jennifer Rogerson vs Lizzie Voigt / Julia Gadberry6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKate Dayoub vs Elizabeth Bruce2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKimberley Jagielko / Kim Tanner vs Kelly Dakan / Callie Jennings6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Amber Hupp
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Kate Dayoub
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.45
Lauren Shouse
published
2.42
Jennifer Rogerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Elizabeth Etheredge
published
2.38
Lindsey Dusek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Laksmi Davaloor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Kimberley Jagielko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.28
Robin Groninga
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Kim Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.24
Natalia Peterson
published
2.21
Rama Welaya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Isabela Joffe
published
2.15
Rhya Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalia Peterson + Lindsey Dusek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amber Hupp
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Kate Dayoub
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Lauren Shouse
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
Jennifer Rogerson
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
Elizabeth Etheredge
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Lindsey Dusek
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Laksmi Davaloor
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Kimberley Jagielko
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Robin Groninga
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Kim Tanner
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Natalia Peterson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Rama Welaya
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Isabela Joffe
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Rhya Miller
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.