Teams

Terina Fowler/Hamilton

2026 EVTA USTA Combo 18 & Over - Summer '26 · Womens 7.5-Monday

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 7:00 PM
Hamilton Crossing Park
Sep 21 7:00 PM
Dellinger Park Tennis Center
2026-08-31vs Joy Suskind/DellingerWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarma Goodson / Reagan Kerce vs Lucy Leaming / Chandler Still3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesOlivia Williams / Kylynn Gallagher vs Leigh Dickson / Jewel Akpose6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSket Angland / Angi Morrison vs Joy Suskind / Sarah Corbin4-6, 4-6
2026-08-24vs Joy Suskind/DellingerWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Shook / Joan Lee vs Jewel Akpose / Chandler Still6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Torbert / MacI Mills vs Christi Cronin / Charlie Lewis4-2
W#3 DoublesLindsey Langhans / Candace Mason vs Joy Suskind / Karen Putzer6-4, 6-2
2026-08-17vs Joy Suskind/DellingerWon 21
L#1 DoublesLindsey Langhans / Joan Lee vs Lucy Leaming / Chandler Still4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesOlivia Williams / Kylynn Gallagher vs Lisa Quinn / Michelle Gambill3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Shook / Sket Angland vs Christi Cronin / Charlie Lewis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-10vs Joy Suskind/DellingerWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarma Goodson / Joan Lee vs Lucy Leaming / Lisa Quinn6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesOlivia Williams / Candace Mason vs Karen Putzer / Jewel Akpose7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTerina Fowler / Pamela Torbert vs Joy Suskind / Sarah Corbin6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Womens 7.5-Monday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Terina Fowler/Hamilton2042754
2Joy Suskind/Dellinger02241059

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Lori Shook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Pamela Torbert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Angi Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Olivia Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Karma Goodson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Lindsey Langhans
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Candace Mason
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Kylynn Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
MacI Mills
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Terina Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Sket Angland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Joan Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Reagan Kerce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terina Fowler + Sket Angland3541% games−7.0% vs expected
MacI Mills + Candace Mason404 matchesnot enough data
Kylynn Gallagher + Joan Lee224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Shook
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Pamela Torbert
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Angi Morrison
38W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Olivia Williams
29W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Karma Goodson
54W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Lindsey Langhans
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Candace Mason
57W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Kylynn Gallagher
23W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
MacI Mills
43W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.10
Terina Fowler
28W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.96
Sket Angland
22W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.93
Joan Lee
22W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Reagan Kerce
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.