Teams

MR: Get A Grip; Casis-Baxter

2021 WMA Tri-Level · 3.5 Women 1

2 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-01-22vs ETC: Anderson-MacColl-RoncalliLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Donnabelle Casis vs Carol MacColl / Susan Anderson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2020-11-25vs LTC Quiet Storm; Critcher-BradwayWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Donnabelle Casis vs Elizabeth Maher / Karen Bradway6-4, 6-5
2020-11-06vs LTC: Malloy 3.5 Tri TeamWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Donnabelle Casis vs Nicole Malloy / Louise Sterling4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2020-11-04vs ETC: Hartry-YorkWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Donnabelle Casis vs Lucy Hartry / Linda Batchelor7-5, 1-4, 1-0
2020-10-30vs ETC: FoardWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Donnabelle Casis vs Michelle Foard / Elizabeth Kollias6-2, 7-5
2020-10-14vs LTC: 10S Friends; BeaulieuWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Donnabelle Casis vs Marie Sattler / Carol Constant6-2, 6-1
2020-10-02vs ETC: PhilbinLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Donnabelle Casis vs Melissa Follansbee / Laurie Philbin5-7, 3-5
2020-10-01vs BAY: O'Riordan-WroblewskiWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Donnabelle Casis vs Jane O'Riordan / Kathy Wroblewski6-1, 6-2
2020-09-24vs TBD: Scott-MasonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Baxter / Donnabelle Casis vs Jacqueline Scott / Michele Kunitz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC: Anderson-MacColl-Roncalli7272665
2LTC: Malloy 3.5 Tri Team7272765
3MR: Get A Grip; Casis-Baxter6363870
4ETC: Philbin5353866
5TBD: Scott-Mason54541077
6ETC: Foard54541181
7ETC: Hartry-York45451178
8LTC Quiet Storm; Critcher-Bradway45451283
9BAY: O'Riordan-Wroblewski07071484
10LTC: 10S Friends; Beaulieu08081696

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Suzanne Baxter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Donnabelle Casis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donnabelle Casis + Suzanne Baxter14662% games+11.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Baxter
219W–131L career · 9 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Donnabelle Casis
43W–36L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.