Teams

Idaho/Coltrin/65&Over7.0M

2025 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-26vs The Adams FamilyWon 10
W#2 DoublesPhil Ellis / Brian Olmstead vs David Koerner / Robert Mize6-1, 6-1
2025-08-14vs The Adams FamilySplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhil Ellis / Brian Olmstead vs Milorad Papic / Bruce Young6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPaige Parker / David Umberger vs Jerry Adams / John Kopplin4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-12vs ButlerWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynn Coltrin / Paige Parker vs William Graff / Mark Bell6-3, 6-4
2025-08-05vs The Adams FamilyWon 10
W#1 DoublesPhil Ellis / Brian Olmstead vs Jerry Adams / Jason Lyons6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Coltrin/65&Over7.0M8122514144
2The Adams Family7220716153
3Nacho's Amigos2752246303

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Phil Ellis
published 3.5
3.44
David Umberger
published 3.5
3.34
Anthony Saulino
published 3.5
3.28
James Elliott
published 3.5
3.27
DOUGLAS de BURGH
published 3.5
Brian Olmstead
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Christopher Lind
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Lynn Coltrin
published 3.5
3.11
Dave Landis
published 3.5
Paige Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Coltrin + James Elliott71345% games−12.5% vs expected
DOUGLAS de BURGH + Christopher Lind241852% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + Anthony Saulino10559% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + DOUGLAS de BURGH5550% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Anthony Saulino6354% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + Christopher Lind4448% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + DOUGLAS de BURGH2545% gamesnot enough data
Anthony Saulino + Paige Parker5257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Phil Ellis
65W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
David Umberger
84W–58L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Anthony Saulino
112W–62L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
James Elliott
95W–93L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
DOUGLAS de BURGH
72W–45L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brian Olmstead
3W–0L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Lind
20W–18L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Lynn Coltrin
87W–108L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Dave Landis
71W–99L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11
Paige Parker
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.