← Teams

SHC-Williams/Monson

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Jeffrey Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Brian Dehen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Jon Monson
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.03
Mary Bullard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.81
Raini Spitze
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.56
Allison Schenk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Neal Burgstahler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Linda Graham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Mary Hlady
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Bill Rhoades
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Results8 ties
2018-11-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRaini Spitze / Rusty Williams vs Patrick Harkin / Coral Nash6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Bullard / Brian Dehen vs Jill Sather / Albert Hensley6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJon Monson / Cathie Recker vs Scott Holland / Yoriko Matsumori4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2018-11-02Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Hunt / Raini Spitze vs Jonathan Eames / Sandi Bittler6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRusty Williams / Mary Hlady vs Rick Wong / Kirsten Giacomini5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJon Monson / Linda Fosberg vs Susan Dussault / Mark Seneker6-2, 6-1
2018-10-28Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesNeal Burgstahler / Anita Havemann vs Halle Jackson / Christopher Perez6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRusty Williams / Allison Schenk vs Stephanie Haas / Vu Nguyen6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Bullard / Brian Dehen vs Douglas Siegler / Ann Arp7-5, 6-2
2018-10-21Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRusty Williams / Linda Graham vs John Droege / Mary Klinger6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJon Monson / Tracy Ouyang vs Steve Eggerts / Hoa Lesselroth7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Dehen / Mary Bullard vs Dick Walpole / Emily Townsend7-6, 6-3
2018-10-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesRaini Spitze / Jon Monson vs Kelly Mohr / Luke Filose7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Hlady / Rusty Williams vs Kana Wakamatsu / Steve Vanderploeg5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathie Recker / Neal Burgstahler vs Justin Shull / Julie Hanson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2018-09-29Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJon Monson / Raini Spitze vs Elaine Zevenbergen / Tony Moreno6-1, 6-4
2018-09-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBrian Dehen / Mary Bullard vs Ian Fudalla / Sue Harrison6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Hunt / Linda Fosberg vs Nathan Austin / Anne Fahlbusch6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJon Monson / Allison Schenk vs Kristin Fudalla / Kenya Reutin3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2018-09-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesRusty Williams / Linda Graham vs Thomas McGirk / Ann Arp7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Hunt / Linda Fosberg vs Eileen Hart / Brian Kyaw6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNeal Burgstahler / Jeannine del Bene vs Cord Speelman / Jenny Pizot6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Jeffrey Hunt
26W–18L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Brian Dehen
29W–44L career
7%87%6%
4.19
4.5
Jon Monson
112W–41L career
2%98%0%
4.13
4.5
Mary Bullard
118W–61L career
10%90%0%
4.03
4.5
Raini Spitze
94W–96L career
64%36%0%
3.81
4
Allison Schenk
40W–63L career
26%74%0%
3.56
4
Neal Burgstahler
34W–32L career
32%68%0%
3.52
4
Linda Graham
76W–76L career
35%65%0%
3.50
4
Mary Hlady
99W–109L career
34%66%0%
3.50
4
Bill Rhoades
79W–87L career
43%57%0%
3.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.