Teams

Hoover Met - McKnight

2025 B'ham Tri-Level Weeknight - 18 & Over M · W

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-10vs Lake Cyrus - Crosswhite/MoralesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMacKenzie Pike / Lauren Blair vs Arya Tamhane / Angela Morales7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelanie Higgins / Gayle Faught vs Erika Burns / Renita Rhone6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Hartin / Anne Miller vs Jade Mason / Kimberly Pruitt6-2, 6-1
2025-06-23vs Hoover Met - LeeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJana Smith / MacKenzie Pike vs Stella Pfau / Jennifer Richards6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesApril McKnight / Ashley Vercher vs Meredith Plains / Leslie Frese6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Hartin / Kaitlyn Mohlenbrok vs Meagan Beard / Lynn Ireland6-2, 6-0
2025-06-09vs West Homewood - Bradley/BirdWon 21
W#1 DoublesJana Smith / Lynne Mohlenbrok vs Calli Robinson / Lee Baxter6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAshley Vercher / Gayle Faught vs Nicole Ussery / Amber Vaughn6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Hartin / Kaitlyn Mohlenbrok vs Meghan Bradley / Madeline Tisdale6-1, 6-3
2025-06-02vs WHP - HsuWon 21
W#1 DoublesMacKenzie Pike / Lauren Blair vs Charli Lavette / Alisha Mckay6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesApril McKnight / Allison Farmer vs Peggy Hsu / Allison Cole5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Higgins / Anne Miller vs Katie Petrella / Laura Dreer6-4, 7-6
2025-05-19vs MBY - Misner/MatthewsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMacKenzie Pike / Jana Smith vs Erica Williams / Elizabeth Morgan1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Miller / Melanie Higgins vs Anna Emblom / Meredith Kilgore7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
MacKenzie Pike
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Lynne Mohlenbrok
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Ashley Vercher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Tanja Mitrev
published
3.87
Lauren Blair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Melanie Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
April McKnight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Kaitlyn Mohlenbrok
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Gayle Faught
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Megan Hartin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaitlyn Mohlenbrok + Megan Hartin4168% games+27.6% vs expected
April McKnight + Melanie Higgins9153% games+14.7% vs expected
April McKnight + Megan Hartin4345% games+6.3% vs expected
April McKnight + Gayle Faught303 matchesnot enough data
April McKnight + Ashley Vercher123 matchesnot enough data
Gayle Faught + Melanie Higgins213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Vercher + Melanie Higgins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MacKenzie Pike
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
Lynne Mohlenbrok
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.98
4
Ashley Vercher
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
Tanja Mitrev
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.88
Lauren Blair
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
Melanie Higgins
68W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.69
4
April McKnight
37W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.62
Kaitlyn Mohlenbrok
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Gayle Faught
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
Megan Hartin
50W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.