Teams

Team 5 Haven Aces

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.11 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-09vs NOVA - DeVitoLost 01
L#2 DoublesGretchen Hobbs / Laura Riesenberg vs Effie Hoffman / Alissa Forbes2-6, 2-6
2024-08-19vs Team 3 Deuces WildWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Amy Hoskins vs Tracye Duffin / Nichole Jimenez6-3, 6-2
2024-08-12vs Team 1 McLean RacqueteersWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Katharine Kastens vs Katherine Loevinger / Sharon Petri7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-06vs Team 10 WGCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Terry Siegfried vs Taryn Walpole / Kerri Thomas4-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheryl Risell
published 4
3.21
Katharine Kastens
published
2.95
Cornelia Turyn
published 3
2.91
Gretchen Hobbs
published 3
2.89
Stephanie Dolan
published
2.79
Terry Siegfried
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Jennifer Lucas
published
2.69
Caroline Kahl
published 3
2.68
Laura Riesenberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Karina Agudelo
published
2.60
2.59
Mary Lewis
published
2.57
2.55
Ashley Adams
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karina Agudelo + Caroline Kahl033 matchesnot enough data
Terry Siegfried + Heather Litvinoff033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Risell
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katharine Kastens
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Cornelia Turyn
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Gretchen Hobbs
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
2.91
Stephanie Dolan
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Terry Siegfried
33W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Jennifer Lucas
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Caroline Kahl
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Laura Riesenberg
88W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68
Karina Agudelo
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Heather Litvinoff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Mary Lewis
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Christine Friedberg
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Ashley Adams
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.