Teams

DAC/Wheeler-Prinz W4.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

20 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Stevie McCartney
published
4.30
Blair Wheeler
published 4.5
4.30
Danielle Heston
published 4.5
4.26
Traci Boddie
published
Annette Wilson
published 4.5
4.23
Shea Davis
published
4.15
Audrey Wendel
published 4.5
4.14
HIROE BLACKLEDGE
published
4.12
Carolyn Schultz
published 4.5
4.12
Kayo Rohovsky
published
3.98
Juli Perez
published
3.95
Erin Koechel
published
3.92
Michelle Marketos
published
3.89
Rena Ramey
published
3.88
Megan Fellman
published
3.88
Maureen McCaffrey
published
3.67
Libby Hartter
published
3.66
Trina Rust-Brimelow
published
Jennifer Cascavilla
published
Liesl Kuby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

HIROE BLACKLEDGE + Kayo Rohovsky7555% games+5.0% vs expected
Audrey Wendel + Traci Boddie8360% games+3.9% vs expected
Erin Koechel + Michelle Marketos3256% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Marketos + Carolyn Schultz3254% gamesnot enough data
Shea Davis + Danielle Heston3257% gamesnot enough data
Rena Ramey + Traci Boddie314 matchesnot enough data
Shea Davis + Traci Boddie224 matchesnot enough data
Stevie McCartney + Shea Davis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stevie McCartney
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Blair Wheeler
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Danielle Heston
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
Traci Boddie
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Annette Wilson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shea Davis
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Audrey Wendel
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
HIROE BLACKLEDGE
27W–22L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Carolyn Schultz
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Kayo Rohovsky
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
4.12
Juli Perez
31W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Erin Koechel
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
Michelle Marketos
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.92
Rena Ramey
10W–26L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.89
Megan Fellman
26W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Maureen McCaffrey
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Libby Hartter
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Trina Rust-Brimelow
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Jennifer Cascavilla
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Liesl Kuby
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.