Teams

GREEN VALLEY CC 18MX8.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

22 players · average NTRP 4.15 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Cristina Tudor
published 5
4.42
Connor Ard
published 4.5
4.31
Jackson DeVries
published 4.5
4.15
Jamille Lee
published 4.5
4.15
Angelita Vallejo
published 4.5
4.08
Yuen Chiang
published
3.98
Warren Valdeabella
published
3.86
Zuhal Elhan
published
3.85
Jonathan Warner
published
3.68
3.60
Donald Barton
published 4
3.59
JoAnn Clark
published
3.54
Paige McConlogue
published
3.53
Niazi Alzouhbi
published
3.43
Julie Neeb
published
3.37
Jeffrey Wei
published
3.29
E George Saghir
published 3.5
3.28
Courtney Bock
published 3.5
3.11
Alexander Ard
published 3.5
Ken Leahy
published
Michael Huber
published
Valerie Blanchard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackson DeVries + Courtney Bock213 matchesnot enough data
Niazi Alzouhbi + Courtney Bock033 matchesnot enough data
JoAnn Clark + Jonathan Warner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cristina Tudor
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
4.52
4.5
Connor Ard
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Jackson DeVries
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Jamille Lee
17W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Angelita Vallejo
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
Yuen Chiang
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
4.08
Warren Valdeabella
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
Zuhal Elhan
74W–38L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.86
Jonathan Warner
22W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Christy Yuk Ling LI
13W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Donald Barton
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
JoAnn Clark
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Paige McConlogue
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
Niazi Alzouhbi
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Julie Neeb
10W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jeffrey Wei
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.37
3.5
E George Saghir
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Courtney Bock
23W–22L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Alexander Ard
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Ken Leahy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Huber
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Blanchard
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.