Teams

CAS.Wallace

2022 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 18 & Over 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-17vs TOC.TurnerWon 20
W#1 DoublesMic Wallace / PETER SELF vs Cliff Ray / Hady Abi-Aad6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Wiegand / Jeffrey Tabelon vs Shirish Javalkar / William Adams6-4, 6-1
2022-07-11vs TOC.XuWon 20
W#1 DoublesMic Wallace / PETER SELF vs Raymond Xu / Patrick Grant6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Tabelon / Gabe Moreno vs Seth Layton / Andrew Kren6-2, 6-3
2022-06-29vs TOC.MerckWon 30
W#1 DoublesPETER SELF / Mark Townley vs Keegan Merck / Matthew Woo6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPaul Wiegand / Jeffrey Tabelon vs Matt Hankinson / Layton Barker6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Lundy / Morten Pedersen vs David Corcoran / Chris Malory6-4, 6-2
2022-06-15vs LOCH.GloerLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Carter / Mark Townley vs Jack Burgess / Steven Gloer2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Wiegand / Jeffrey Tabelon vs Everett Laborde / Scott Riley3-6, 4-6
2022-06-06vs TOC.MorrowWon 21
W#1 DoublesPETER SELF / Mic Wallace vs Jake Wolfe / John Pelphrey7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Tabelon / Gabe Moreno vs Tom Morrow / Christopher Siege5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLuivi Valero / Morten Pedersen vs Charles Gordon / Taylor VICK6-3, 6-2
2022-05-25vs TOC.VeerappanLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Townley / William Carter vs Sandeep Verghese / Rohit Ghotkar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJ Wright / Morten Pedersen vs Debashish Pal / Bhaswanth Chava2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 18 & Over 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Mic Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Mark Townley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.67
Jeffrey Tabelon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Luivi Valero
published
3.36
J Wright
published 3.5
3.31
Brett Allan
published 3.5
3.25
Morten Pedersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Paul Wiegand
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

J Wright + Brett Allan4152% gamesnot enough data
Morten Pedersen + Jeffrey Tabelon2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Mic Wallace
122W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Mark Townley
40W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Jeffrey Tabelon
88W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Luivi Valero
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
J Wright
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Brett Allan
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Morten Pedersen
78W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Paul Wiegand
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.