← Teams

CRRC-Ash

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.19 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Wendi Ouellette
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
—
Jane Paulsen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.22
Julia Henry
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.96
Victoria Cartwright
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.84
Valerie Neill
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.79
Carol Glenn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Michelle Ellett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-06-18Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJulia Henry / Jane Paulsen vs Heidi Cronn / Tracey Forrest6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Glenn / Joan Randall vs Susan Sienko / Elizabeth Large6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKC Bildner / Wendi Ouellette vs Dorothy Cofield / Sally Papadimas6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-11Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJane Paulsen / Joan Randall vs Linda Edwards / Alma Siri6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Nicola Ash vs Stacy Naccachian / Janet Gilkey6-4, 6-1
2023-06-04Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesVictoria Cartwright vs Amy Carolan7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoan Randall / Julia Henry vs Katja Daoud / Yone Akagi6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNicola Ash / Michelle Ellett vs Tammy Russum / Kimbra Kasch0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-13Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesVictoria Walton / Valerie Neill vs Mihee Park / Dawan Pandya5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVictoria Cartwright vs Lei Ma6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Nicola Ash vs Janet Ha / Mihye Ko6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Glenn / Dianna Kaady vs Janice Kuo / Jinmi Kemple7-5, 6-4
2023-05-06Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesWendi Ouellette / Jane Paulsen vs Natasha Rinard / Nora Semonsen6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVictoria Cartwright / Valerie Neill vs Devrie Brennan / Erin Keyser6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMolly Hemsley / Michelle Ellett vs Shaun Anderson / Abby Hata6-0, 6-3
2023-04-29Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesVictoria Walton / Julia Henry vs Jessica Dalpiaz / Katherine McMillan6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVictoria Cartwright / Joan Randall vs Audrey Crespo / Julie Dicks6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNicola Ash / KC Bildner vs Jennifer Thompson / Nancy Pan7-5, 7-5
2023-04-15Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesVictoria Cartwright / Nicola Ash vs Elizabeth Maguire / Autumn Bunch6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVictoria Walton / Valerie Neill vs Andrea Hobi / Nancy Heck1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Glenn / Michelle Ellett vs Susanne Cochran / Jodi Wilkins7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJulia Henry / Wendi Ouellette vs Delena Palena / Tamara Phillips6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJane Paulsen vs Alisa Rakoz6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDianna Kaady / Valerie Neill vs Tamee Baffaro / Chana Dolbey6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Wendi Ouellette
177W–50L career
19%81%0%
3.55
3.5
Jane Paulsen
84W–62L career
not enough data
—
3
Julia Henry
87W–52L career
0%18%82%
3.22
3
Victoria Cartwright
58W–80L career
0%83%17%
2.96
3
Valerie Neill
48W–76L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Carol Glenn
82W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74
3
Michelle Ellett
41W–39L career
21%79%0%
2.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.