Teams

LOS GATOS SR 18MX9.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Denise Alberto
published 4.5
4.22
Robyn Girard
published
4.21
Mark Ebner
published
4.17
Shawn Robinson
published
4.17
Marybeth Gonzales
published
4.11
Anand Vasudev
published 4.5
4.10
Tara Garneau
published
4.09
Thomas Krulevitch
published
4.08
Jayesh Vyas
published
4.01
David Yvanovich
published 4.5
4.01
Stefanie Bray
published
4.00
Christine Jarvis
published 4.5
3.98
Gene Cherng
published
3.88
Eric Flint
published
3.86
Neil Jarvis
published
3.85
3.84
Donna Kaneko
published
3.82
Bruno Vitali
published 4
Geri Lamble
published
Gwenaelle Mille
published
Mike Lamble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Ebner + Denise Alberto4157% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Denise Alberto
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
4.44
Robyn Girard
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.22
Mark Ebner
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
Shawn Robinson
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Marybeth Gonzales
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Anand Vasudev
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
4.11
Tara Garneau
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
Thomas Krulevitch
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
Jayesh Vyas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
David Yvanovich
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
Stefanie Bray
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
4.5
Christine Jarvis
1W–11L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
4.00
Gene Cherng
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
Eric Flint
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
Neil Jarvis
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
Rajasundaram Rajasekaran
24W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
Donna Kaneko
10W–28L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.84
4
Bruno Vitali
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Geri Lamble
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gwenaelle Mille
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Lamble
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.