Teams

Suntree - Ford

2026 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-29vs EGYC - LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Ford / Sacha Armstrong vs Elizabeth Findley / Michelle Robinson6-1, 2-1
2026-03-09vs RCCB - HingleWon 10
W#1 SinglesSacha Armstrong vs Julie Thalen6-4, 6-1
2026-02-09vs EFSC - TaylorLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Ford / Sacha Armstrong vs Trisha Watson / Teresa Osborn4-6, 3-6
2026-01-26vs Fee - RouveyrolLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Breisch / Linda White vs Katharyn Luer / Kim Tice5-7, 2-6
2026-01-19vs RCCB - AboudWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Ford / Sacha Armstrong vs Erin Schlitts / Rachel Gould2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-12vs Brevard/SalvatoreLost 13
W#1 DoublesSharon Ford / Chrissy James vs Yvonne Salvatore / Suzanne McBride6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCaroline Jiborn vs Melissa Yanko7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Waltmeyer / Marianne Fraser vs Heather Taylor / Ashley Stanley2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Breisch / Lindsay Schram vs Katie Recker / Erin Conway3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Sacha Armstrong
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Chrissy James
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amy McCleery
published 3
2.66
Janice Waltmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Caroline Jiborn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.53
Laura Breisch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
JANETTE TABOR
published 3
2.46
Wendy Paul
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.45
Linda White
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Marianne Fraser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Deborah Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Karen Bastos
published
Lindsay Schram
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Birchler
published
Tandy Baerst
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sacha Armstrong
42W–28L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Chrissy James
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Amy McCleery
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Janice Waltmeyer
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Caroline Jiborn
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Laura Breisch
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
JANETTE TABOR
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Wendy Paul
14W–5L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
Linda White
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Marianne Fraser
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%71%29%
2.43
2.5
Deborah Tuttle
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
Karen Bastos
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsay Schram
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Birchler
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tandy Baerst
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.